PGJ vs. MCHS ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS)
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.43
Average Daily Volume
192,044
54
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
MCHS Description
Under normal circumstances, the Matthews China Discovery Active ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 65% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of small companies. In addition, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in China. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.16
Average Daily Volume
2,529
5
Performance
| Period | PGJ | MCHS |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -5.78% | -1.04% |
| 60 Days | 12.63% | 12.90% |
| 90 Days | 17.27% | 16.05% |
| 12 Months | 1.85% |
PGJ Overweight 50 Positions Relative to MCHS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | B | 9.52% | |
| TCOM | B | 8.84% | |
| JD | D | 8.37% | |
| BABA | D | 7.56% | |
| BIDU | D | 6.21% | |
| NTES | C | 3.64% | |
| TME | D | 3.6% | |
| ZTO | F | 3.39% | |
| NIO | F | 3.36% | |
| VIPS | F | 3.32% | |
| HTHT | D | 3.26% | |
| LI | F | 2.65% | |
| QFIN | A | 2.33% | |
| TAL | F | 2.25% | |
| XPEV | C | 1.55% | |
| GDS | C | 1.34% | |
| BILI | D | 1.27% | |
| ATHM | C | 1.06% | |
| DQ | C | 0.87% | |
| ZLAB | C | 0.77% | |
| MOMO | D | 0.68% | |
| RLX | C | 0.67% | |
| IQ | F | 0.67% | |
| FINV | B | 0.65% | |
| MNSO | C | 0.53% | |
| JKS | D | 0.48% | |
| CSIQ | F | 0.45% | |
| EH | C | 0.45% | |
| WB | C | 0.44% | |
| TIGR | D | 0.43% | |
| DDL | B | 0.34% | |
| VNET | C | 0.28% | |
| QD | B | 0.27% | |
| LX | C | 0.26% | |
| SOHU | F | 0.25% | |
| NOAH | C | 0.24% | |
| GOTU | F | 0.23% | |
| KC | A | 0.19% | |
| RERE | C | 0.18% | |
| HUYA | F | 0.17% | |
| API | B | 0.15% | |
| DAO | B | 0.11% | |
| DOYU | C | 0.11% | |
| TUYA | D | 0.11% | |
| WDH | C | 0.1% | |
| DADA | F | 0.09% | |
| BZUN | F | 0.07% | |
| CAAS | B | 0.07% | |
| NIU | F | 0.06% | |
| CBAT | F | 0.05% |
PGJ Underweight 1 Positions Relative to MCHS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACMR | F | -2.2% |
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
MCHS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
