PGJ vs. LYLD ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD)
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.06
Average Daily Volume
192,551
54
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
LYLD Description
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.79
Average Daily Volume
1,238
50
Performance
| Period | PGJ | LYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -6.13% | 4.10% |
| 60 Days | 9.35% | 3.81% |
| 90 Days | 15.58% | 5.46% |
| 12 Months | 0.38% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PGJ | Weight in LYLD | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | C | 9.52% | 2.31% | 2.31% |
PGJ Overweight 53 Positions Relative to LYLD
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCOM | B | 8.84% | |
| JD | D | 8.37% | |
| BABA | D | 7.56% | |
| BIDU | F | 6.21% | |
| BEKE | D | 4.54% | |
| NTES | D | 3.64% | |
| TME | D | 3.6% | |
| ZTO | F | 3.39% | |
| NIO | F | 3.36% | |
| VIPS | F | 3.32% | |
| HTHT | D | 3.26% | |
| YMM | C | 3.11% | |
| LI | F | 2.65% | |
| BZ | F | 2.57% | |
| QFIN | B | 2.33% | |
| TAL | F | 2.25% | |
| XPEV | C | 1.55% | |
| GDS | C | 1.34% | |
| BILI | D | 1.27% | |
| ATAT | C | 1.18% | |
| ATHM | D | 1.06% | |
| DQ | F | 0.87% | |
| ZLAB | C | 0.77% | |
| MOMO | D | 0.68% | |
| RLX | C | 0.67% | |
| IQ | F | 0.67% | |
| FINV | B | 0.65% | |
| MNSO | F | 0.53% | |
| JKS | F | 0.48% | |
| CSIQ | F | 0.45% | |
| EH | F | 0.45% | |
| WB | D | 0.44% | |
| TIGR | D | 0.43% | |
| DDL | C | 0.34% | |
| VNET | B | 0.28% | |
| QD | C | 0.27% | |
| LX | C | 0.26% | |
| SOHU | F | 0.25% | |
| NOAH | D | 0.24% | |
| GOTU | F | 0.23% | |
| KC | A | 0.19% | |
| RERE | B | 0.18% | |
| HUYA | F | 0.17% | |
| API | C | 0.15% | |
| DAO | B | 0.11% | |
| DOYU | C | 0.11% | |
| TUYA | F | 0.11% | |
| WDH | F | 0.1% | |
| DADA | F | 0.09% | |
| BZUN | F | 0.07% | |
| CAAS | C | 0.07% | |
| NIU | F | 0.06% | |
| CBAT | F | 0.05% |
PGJ Underweight 49 Positions Relative to LYLD
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PYPL | B | -2.73% | |
| FOXA | B | -2.53% | |
| KEY | B | -2.31% | |
| TOL | B | -2.28% | |
| TAP | C | -2.27% | |
| BKR | B | -2.26% | |
| AFL | B | -2.25% | |
| CFG | B | -2.25% | |
| BK | A | -2.22% | |
| USB | A | -2.2% | |
| T | A | -2.16% | |
| TFC | A | -2.16% | |
| GM | B | -2.16% | |
| EBAY | D | -2.16% | |
| CF | B | -2.14% | |
| HIG | B | -2.13% | |
| AFG | A | -2.1% | |
| CMCSA | B | -2.08% | |
| MET | A | -2.07% | |
| JBL | B | -2.06% | |
| PHM | D | -2.05% | |
| UHS | D | -2.0% | |
| LEN | D | -1.97% | |
| STLD | B | -1.96% | |
| EOG | A | -1.94% | |
| EMN | D | -1.93% | |
| CRBG | B | -1.92% | |
| RS | B | -1.91% | |
| THC | D | -1.9% | |
| IPG | D | -1.9% | |
| PFG | D | -1.89% | |
| PRU | A | -1.88% | |
| AIG | B | -1.87% | |
| GIS | D | -1.87% | |
| CVX | A | -1.87% | |
| SNX | C | -1.85% | |
| MRO | B | -1.84% | |
| KHC | F | -1.82% | |
| CI | F | -1.8% | |
| COP | C | -1.8% | |
| CAG | D | -1.77% | |
| NUE | C | -1.72% | |
| PSX | C | -1.67% | |
| MPC | D | -1.65% | |
| HAL | C | -1.65% | |
| CNC | D | -1.65% | |
| VLO | C | -1.62% | |
| DVN | F | -1.51% | |
| ADM | D | -1.51% |
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LYLD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
