PGJ vs. GMF ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF)
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.16

Average Daily Volume

188,691

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
GMF

SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

GMF Description The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to define and measure the investable universe of publicly traded companies domiciled in emerging Asian Pacific markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$116.08

Average Daily Volume

18,153

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PGJ GMF
30 Days -7.33% -5.14%
60 Days 16.51% 3.16%
90 Days 14.30% 3.02%
12 Months 2.50% 19.96%
37 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PGJ Weight in GMF Overlap
API B 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
ATHM D 1.01% 0.03% 0.03%
BABA D 7.44% 2.4% 2.4%
BEKE C 4.86% 0.18% 0.18%
BIDU F 6.19% 0.36% 0.36%
BILI C 1.39% 0.08% 0.08%
BZ F 2.6% 0.05% 0.05%
DADA F 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
DQ D 0.84% 0.02% 0.02%
GDS B 1.18% 0.02% 0.02%
GOTU F 0.25% 0.01% 0.01%
HUYA F 0.17% 0.0% 0.0%
IQ F 0.7% 0.01% 0.01%
JKS D 0.5% 0.01% 0.01%
LI F 2.72% 0.19% 0.19%
LX C 0.27% 0.0% 0.0%
MNSO D 0.53% 0.02% 0.02%
MOMO D 0.64% 0.02% 0.02%
NIO F 3.5% 0.1% 0.1%
NIU F 0.06% 0.0% 0.0%
NOAH C 0.24% 0.01% 0.01%
QD B 0.25% 0.01% 0.01%
QFIN B 2.37% 0.03% 0.03%
RLX C 0.6% 0.02% 0.02%
SOHU F 0.26% 0.01% 0.01%
TAL D 2.52% 0.08% 0.08%
TCOM B 9.12% 0.45% 0.45%
TIGR C 0.48% 0.02% 0.02%
TME F 3.57% 0.04% 0.04%
TUYA C 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
VIPS F 3.21% 0.08% 0.08%
VNET D 0.25% 0.01% 0.01%
WB F 0.45% 0.01% 0.01%
XPEV C 1.39% 0.09% 0.09%
YMM C 3.05% 0.06% 0.06%
YUMC B 9.25% 0.32% 0.32%
ZTO D 3.39% 0.17% 0.17%
PGJ Overweight 17 Positions Relative to GMF
Symbol Grade Weight
JD C 8.94%
NTES C 3.19%
HTHT C 3.11%
ATAT B 1.1%
ZLAB C 0.8%
FINV C 0.65%
CSIQ F 0.46%
EH C 0.44%
DDL B 0.33%
RERE D 0.17%
KC B 0.14%
DAO C 0.1%
DOYU B 0.1%
WDH C 0.09%
BZUN F 0.07%
CAAS B 0.07%
CBAT F 0.05%
PGJ Underweight 17 Positions Relative to GMF
Symbol Grade Weight
TSM B -9.14%
HDB C -1.53%
IBN C -1.16%
PDD F -1.11%
INFY D -1.02%
UMC F -0.32%
WIT B -0.31%
MMYT C -0.2%
CHT D -0.18%
BGNE D -0.16%
LEGN F -0.05%
SIMO F -0.04%
HIMX F -0.02%
YY C -0.02%
BTBT C -0.01%
CAN C -0.0%
IBN C -0.0%
Compare ETFs