PEJ vs. QVAL ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Portfolio (PEJ) to ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
PEJ
PowerShares Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Portfolio
PEJ Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index is designed to provide capital appreciation by thoroughly evaluating companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 30 US leisure and entertainment companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the design, production or distribution of goods or services in the leisure and entertainment industries. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$45.27
Average Daily Volume
57,738
28
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$43.24
Average Daily Volume
23,209
50
Performance
Period | PEJ | QVAL |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 2.69% | -0.66% |
60 Days | 0.97% | -0.82% |
90 Days | 1.72% | 0.23% |
12 Months | 6.51% | 24.92% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in PEJ | Weight in QVAL | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXA | A | 2.68% | 2.03% | 2.03% |
PEJ Overweight 27 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
HLT | B | 5.2% | |
RCL | B | 5.15% | |
BKNG | C | 5.1% | |
ABNB | D | 4.98% | |
DPZ | D | 4.9% | |
SYY | D | 4.83% | |
CMG | D | 4.78% | |
WBD | F | 4.51% | |
CNK | B | 3.26% | |
EXPE | C | 2.98% | |
SKYW | B | 2.98% | |
NCLH | C | 2.97% | |
LNW | B | 2.93% | |
EAT | D | 2.89% | |
WING | D | 2.88% | |
MMYT | C | 2.81% | |
CHH | C | 2.78% | |
LGF.A | F | 2.75% | |
MSGS | C | 2.72% | |
TXRH | D | 2.67% | |
H | B | 2.65% | |
MSGE | C | 2.63% | |
PLYA | D | 2.59% | |
MANU | D | 2.57% | |
TRIP | F | 2.57% | |
SHAK | D | 2.42% | |
PARA | D | 2.25% |
PEJ Underweight 49 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
ARCH | F | -2.24% | |
ON | D | -2.13% | |
FANG | B | -2.09% | |
WFRD | B | -2.08% | |
LBRT | D | -2.06% | |
VLO | D | -2.06% | |
CEIX | C | -2.05% | |
APA | D | -2.05% | |
TEX | D | -2.05% | |
ALSN | B | -2.04% | |
PBF | F | -2.03% | |
LEA | F | -2.03% | |
SIG | D | -2.02% | |
BG | B | -2.02% | |
OMC | C | -2.01% | |
CMCSA | F | -2.01% | |
THC | B | -2.0% | |
ULTA | D | -2.0% | |
INSW | D | -2.0% | |
MAT | F | -2.0% | |
T | B | -1.99% | |
TAP | F | -1.99% | |
HPQ | C | -1.99% | |
HAL | F | -1.98% | |
MO | A | -1.98% | |
UFPI | C | -1.98% | |
ELV | C | -1.98% | |
CVI | F | -1.98% | |
DINO | F | -1.98% | |
CTSH | C | -1.98% | |
CNC | D | -1.97% | |
KHC | D | -1.97% | |
AGCO | F | -1.96% | |
DAL | D | -1.96% | |
JBL | F | -1.96% | |
IPG | F | -1.96% | |
CRI | F | -1.95% | |
UTHR | B | -1.95% | |
SNA | D | -1.95% | |
TMHC | C | -1.95% | |
MOH | F | -1.95% | |
CROX | D | -1.95% | |
PCAR | D | -1.94% | |
TOL | C | -1.93% | |
OC | C | -1.93% | |
PHM | C | -1.91% | |
GPK | D | -1.9% | |
PVH | D | -1.89% | |
SM | D | -1.87% |
PEJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords