PEJ vs. QLTY ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Portfolio (PEJ) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
PEJ
PowerShares Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Portfolio
PEJ Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index is designed to provide capital appreciation by thoroughly evaluating companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 30 US leisure and entertainment companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the design, production or distribution of goods or services in the leisure and entertainment industries. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$51.77
Average Daily Volume
47,415
25
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
QLTY Description
QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.13
Average Daily Volume
253,252
34
Performance
| Period | PEJ | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 5.01% | -1.29% |
| 60 Days | 8.75% | -1.08% |
| 90 Days | 15.29% | 1.65% |
| 12 Months | 32.21% | 26.49% |
PEJ Overweight 23 Positions Relative to QLTY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCL | A | 6.07% | |
| LYV | A | 5.89% | |
| BKNG | A | 5.64% | |
| WBD | B | 5.35% | |
| FOXA | B | 5.09% | |
| SYY | B | 4.33% | |
| EAT | A | 3.91% | |
| SKYW | B | 3.53% | |
| EXPE | A | 3.11% | |
| TXRH | B | 2.82% | |
| CNK | A | 2.72% | |
| USFD | B | 2.7% | |
| MCRI | A | 2.7% | |
| H | B | 2.55% | |
| MSGS | B | 2.55% | |
| MMYT | C | 2.52% | |
| CHDN | C | 2.46% | |
| ACEL | C | 2.45% | |
| TRIP | D | 2.4% | |
| LTH | D | 2.34% | |
| LGF.A | F | 2.16% | |
| RRR | F | 2.15% | |
| WING | F | 1.95% |
PEJ Underweight 32 Positions Relative to QLTY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | D | -6.46% | |
| AAPL | C | -5.33% | |
| ORCL | A | -4.71% | |
| META | C | -4.5% | |
| GOOGL | B | -4.43% | |
| JNJ | D | -4.24% | |
| ABT | A | -4.17% | |
| UNH | B | -3.62% | |
| TXN | B | -3.53% | |
| ACN | C | -3.3% | |
| V | A | -3.22% | |
| PG | C | -3.2% | |
| ISRG | A | -2.92% | |
| KLAC | F | -2.85% | |
| LRCX | F | -2.85% | |
| CRM | B | -2.84% | |
| KO | D | -2.81% | |
| ELV | F | -2.5% | |
| WFC | A | -2.45% | |
| AVGO | C | -2.45% | |
| MRK | F | -2.41% | |
| AMZN | B | -2.4% | |
| USB | A | -2.31% | |
| OTIS | C | -2.25% | |
| TJX | A | -2.14% | |
| GE | D | -1.73% | |
| MDLZ | F | -1.72% | |
| LLY | F | -1.61% | |
| STZ | D | -1.59% | |
| CI | D | -1.49% | |
| DGX | A | -1.35% | |
| TMO | F | -0.91% |
PEJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QLTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
