NBSM vs. POWA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) to Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA)
NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description

NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.75

Average Daily Volume

11,547

Number of Holdings *

46

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
POWA

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF

POWA Description The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index focuses on companies that have the smallest deviations among their annual gross profit margins over the last five years. The fund will concentrate its investments in securities of issuers in any one industry or group of industries only to the extent that the underlying index reflects a concentration in that industry or group of industries.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$86.24

Average Daily Volume

5,145

Number of Holdings *

48

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period NBSM POWA
30 Days 5.91% 2.89%
60 Days 5.08% 2.88%
90 Days 6.00% 4.77%
12 Months 27.83%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in NBSM Weight in POWA Overlap
ATR B 2.93% 2.18% 2.18%
ROL B 1.46% 1.95% 1.46%
TSCO D 1.59% 2.01% 1.59%
NBSM Overweight 43 Positions Relative to POWA
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B 4.27%
EXP A 3.88%
KEX C 3.67%
WSO A 3.19%
ITT A 3.11%
VMI B 3.11%
RYAN B 3.08%
RBC A 2.92%
HAE C 2.9%
TYL B 2.72%
CNX A 2.68%
TTEK F 2.46%
CHE D 2.41%
RLI B 2.33%
CBU B 2.21%
MKSI C 2.17%
TTC D 2.12%
CR A 2.09%
GGG B 2.04%
LFUS F 1.99%
LECO B 1.99%
TXRH C 1.94%
ENTG D 1.88%
CFR B 1.86%
TECH D 1.81%
NXST C 1.77%
LSCC D 1.77%
POWI D 1.59%
TDW F 1.59%
PB A 1.59%
BSY D 1.54%
SPSC C 1.51%
CHD B 1.51%
LNT A 1.49%
SSD D 1.37%
ICLR D 1.21%
MANH D 1.16%
IBP D 1.15%
BFAM D 1.14%
FND C 1.09%
AWI A 1.04%
CNM D 0.99%
CVLT B 0.51%
NBSM Underweight 45 Positions Relative to POWA
Symbol Grade Weight
FAST B -2.35%
NOW A -2.35%
JCI C -2.34%
CMI A -2.33%
ADSK A -2.32%
AME A -2.28%
ZBRA B -2.19%
WMT A -2.19%
LOW D -2.17%
HD A -2.16%
DOV A -2.16%
HEI B -2.16%
KR B -2.15%
CAH B -2.12%
MCK B -2.12%
WAT B -2.08%
BBY D -2.08%
MSCI C -2.07%
VEEV C -2.07%
ACN C -2.07%
OTIS C -2.06%
JBHT C -2.03%
COST B -2.01%
IRM D -2.0%
CDNS B -1.99%
VRSN F -1.96%
COR B -1.96%
ANSS B -1.96%
MSFT F -1.91%
SYY B -1.9%
BAH F -1.9%
LMT D -1.89%
GEHC F -1.89%
ZTS D -1.87%
VRTX F -1.87%
STE F -1.84%
SNPS B -1.8%
PEP F -1.77%
ADM D -1.76%
XYL D -1.75%
HSY F -1.69%
MTD D -1.61%
LRCX F -1.57%
IQV D -1.52%
DLTR F -1.25%
Compare ETFs