MID vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.89

Average Daily Volume

4,883

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.45

Average Daily Volume

3,102

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MID CZA
30 Days 5.15% 3.26%
60 Days 4.77% 5.04%
90 Days 8.34% 7.69%
12 Months 37.37% 30.18%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MID Weight in CZA Overlap
ESI A 4.85% 0.43% 0.43%
J F 0.87% 1.3% 0.87%
XYL D 1.93% 1.94% 1.93%
MID Overweight 37 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
MSCI C 5.64%
DUOL A 4.55%
MPWR F 4.05%
POOL C 4.0%
AVNT B 3.95%
BFAM D 3.94%
NET B 3.77%
LII A 3.48%
MANH D 3.47%
RSG A 3.45%
CMG B 3.05%
CDW F 2.72%
CHD B 2.72%
HUBB B 2.71%
CDNS B 2.63%
TRGP B 2.44%
VST B 2.37%
ENPH F 2.26%
IDXX F 2.16%
NTRA B 2.07%
ONON A 2.07%
ABNB C 1.9%
EFX F 1.86%
ALNY D 1.78%
COR B 1.74%
ARGX A 1.69%
TPG A 1.6%
IQV D 1.59%
NU C 1.53%
PODD C 1.5%
VRT B 1.48%
CNM D 1.37%
DXCM D 1.33%
GEHC F 1.27%
TECH D 1.07%
BLD D 0.98%
AZEK A 0.98%
MID Underweight 91 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
VMC B -2.4%
WAB B -2.18%
AVB B -2.11%
ETR B -2.06%
WTW B -2.04%
BRO B -1.98%
STT A -1.86%
EQR B -1.86%
PPG F -1.84%
DOV A -1.77%
LYB F -1.73%
FTV C -1.7%
KEYS A -1.7%
VLTO D -1.62%
AEE A -1.58%
WRB A -1.53%
CINF A -1.53%
ES D -1.46%
NTRS A -1.44%
LPLA A -1.43%
TDY B -1.41%
IFF D -1.41%
PKG A -1.38%
LDOS C -1.38%
CSL C -1.31%
ESS B -1.3%
PFG D -1.3%
CHKP D -1.27%
FOX A -1.24%
AER B -1.24%
JBHT C -1.2%
BAH F -1.16%
CRBG B -1.16%
PNR A -1.12%
IEX B -1.11%
BAX D -1.1%
TRMB B -1.1%
WMG C -1.1%
MAS D -1.09%
WLK D -1.05%
GGG B -0.99%
UDR B -0.95%
AMCR D -0.94%
ACM A -0.94%
WES C -0.93%
GLPI C -0.89%
REG B -0.85%
CNA B -0.85%
PFGC B -0.83%
LOGI D -0.81%
NVT B -0.8%
WPC D -0.79%
ITT A -0.79%
EMN D -0.76%
RRX B -0.76%
AIZ A -0.73%
BWXT B -0.72%
ATR B -0.71%
CHDN B -0.69%
SEIC B -0.67%
AOS F -0.66%
WWD B -0.65%
CACI D -0.64%
ALSN B -0.64%
EHC B -0.62%
CR A -0.61%
INGR B -0.58%
KNTK B -0.58%
TFX F -0.58%
CHE D -0.53%
VOYA B -0.5%
IVZ B -0.5%
ESAB B -0.48%
BLCO D -0.47%
BPOP B -0.46%
OSK B -0.46%
FLS B -0.46%
MDU D -0.45%
AWI A -0.43%
IDA A -0.41%
FNB A -0.4%
ESNT D -0.39%
COLD D -0.39%
SLGN A -0.38%
SIGI C -0.38%
SNDR B -0.35%
CWEN C -0.35%
RRR D -0.34%
ACT D -0.34%
ST F -0.31%
FLO D -0.3%
Compare ETFs