MFUT vs. BIBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT) to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL)

MFUT

Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF

MFUT Description

The fund is an actively-managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing pursuant to a trend following program. Using the trend strategy, the fund will invest in futures contracts and futures-related instruments (such as forwards) and spot contracts in global markets across a wide range of asset classes, including equities, fixed income, currencies and commodities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$16.70

Average Daily Volume

10,165

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

BIBL

Inspire 100 ETF

BIBL Description

The investment seeks to replicate investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the Inspire 100 Index. The index provider selects domestic large capitalization equity securities using the index provider's Inspire Impact Score®, a proprietary selection methodology that is designed to assign a score to a particular security based on the security's alignment with biblical values and the positive impact that company has on the world through various environmental, social and governance criterion.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.64

Average Daily Volume

39,524

Number of Holdings ^*

100

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	MFUT	BIBL
30 Days	-3.66%	-0.49%
60 Days	-7.81%	2.59%
90 Days	-5.76%	3.93%
12 Months		28.67%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in MFUT	Weight in BIBL	Overlap
EXR	C	1.9%	0.92%	0.92%
FTNT	A	1.71%	1.85%	1.71%
NEM	F	1.35%	1.22%	1.22%
PAYX	B	3.32%	1.37%	1.37%

MFUT Overweight 20 Positions Relative to BIBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LMT	D	4.62%
ADP	B	3.92%
XOM	B	3.12%
PSA	C	2.94%
NOC	D	2.84%
SRE	A	2.74%
LNG	A	2.61%
AAPL	C	2.56%
KDP	D	2.48%
GIS	D	2.48%
WHD	B	2.2%
APD	A	2.12%
UNH	B	2.04%
AMT	D	1.93%
SNY	D	1.77%
ELV	F	-0.91%
DOW	F	-2.25%
MRK	F	-2.4%
STZ	D	-3.05%
ZBH	C	-3.31%

MFUT Underweight 96 Positions Relative to BIBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ISRG	A	-5.01%
CAT	B	-4.63%
PGR	B	-3.99%
ANET	C	-3.13%
PLD	D	-2.87%
PH	A	-2.34%
APH	B	-2.31%
KLAC	F	-2.28%
CTAS	B	-2.27%
SNPS	C	-2.26%
WELL	A	-2.12%
IBKR	A	-1.89%
EMR	A	-1.88%
RSG	B	-1.71%
SLB	C	-1.64%
ROP	C	-1.6%
PCAR	B	-1.58%
DLR	A	-1.54%
KMI	A	-1.53%
SPG	A	-1.52%
FCX	F	-1.5%
FICO	A	-1.49%
FANG	D	-1.49%
URI	B	-1.45%
ODFL	B	-1.3%
MSCI	A	-1.2%
TRGP	A	-1.14%
VRSK	B	-1.06%
VEEV	C	-1.01%
IQV	F	-1.01%
IDXX	F	-0.95%
MCHP	F	-0.92%
NUE	D	-0.9%
RMD	C	-0.89%
FCNCA	A	-0.86%
CSGP	F	-0.85%
ANSS	B	-0.79%
ETR	A	-0.79%
ON	F	-0.77%
EQR	C	-0.75%
MPWR	F	-0.72%
DOV	A	-0.72%
TYL	B	-0.69%
DVN	F	-0.68%
KEYS	C	-0.68%
WST	C	-0.67%
MTD	F	-0.67%
VTR	C	-0.67%
NTAP	D	-0.62%
EME	B	-0.59%
STE	D	-0.57%
BLDR	D	-0.57%
ATO	A	-0.57%
WSO	A	-0.56%
INVH	D	-0.55%
FSLR	F	-0.54%
STLD	B	-0.53%
CSL	B	-0.53%
CMS	C	-0.52%
ARE	D	-0.52%
JBHT	B	-0.5%
NTNX	A	-0.49%
CNP	A	-0.49%
GEN	B	-0.48%
L	A	-0.48%
MOH	F	-0.48%
TER	F	-0.46%
GPC	D	-0.45%
TRMB	A	-0.44%
MANH	D	-0.44%
SUI	D	-0.43%
ENTG	F	-0.41%
INCY	B	-0.39%
UDR	C	-0.39%
NDSN	B	-0.38%
ELS	B	-0.37%
EVRG	A	-0.37%
AGR	A	-0.36%
EPAM	B	-0.36%
OKTA	D	-0.35%
SFM	A	-0.35%
JBL	C	-0.35%
SWKS	F	-0.35%
CAG	F	-0.34%
HST	D	-0.33%
WPC	D	-0.32%
LW	C	-0.31%
ALB	C	-0.3%
SMCI	F	-0.3%
EVR	A	-0.3%
WAL	A	-0.27%
AOS	F	-0.26%
ENPH	F	-0.24%
UWMC	F	-0.24%
TMHC	B	-0.2%
LSCC	D	-0.19%