MEM vs. BUYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) to Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ)
MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

MEM Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in emerging market countries. It seeks to invest in companies capable of sustainable growth based on the fundamental characteristics of those companies, including balance sheet information; number of employees; size and stability of cash flow; management’s depth, adaptability and integrity; product lines; marketing strategies; corporate governance; and financial health.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.20

Average Daily Volume

3,539

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BUYZ

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF

BUYZ Description The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of disruptive commerce. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the fund concentrates its investments in consumer discretionary related industries. It is non-diversified. Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies benefitting from transformation in the e-commerce space. Provides access to companies that are related to new online markets, streamlined procurement systems, and game-changing ways to deliver goods and services

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.99

Average Daily Volume

1,000

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MEM BUYZ
30 Days 1.83% 4.54%
60 Days 2.73% 9.87%
90 Days 2.32% 8.99%
12 Months 15.68% 36.36%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MEM Weight in BUYZ Overlap
BABA B 4.13% 0.8% 0.8%
BABA B 1.0% 0.8% 0.8%
MELI B 1.5% 5.37% 1.5%
MMYT B 2.11% 2.37% 2.11%
MEM Overweight 17 Positions Relative to BUYZ
Symbol Grade Weight
IBN B 3.69%
HDB C 2.99%
TCOM C 1.99%
INFY C 1.74%
KB D 1.41%
SE B 1.01%
SHG C 1.0%
JD C 0.98%
ITUB C 0.97%
PBR D 0.79%
BAP B 0.78%
BEKE D 0.65%
NU B 0.61%
GLOB D 0.59%
ASAI F 0.51%
SKM B 0.5%
FCX D 0.43%
MEM Underweight 37 Positions Relative to BUYZ
Symbol Grade Weight
AMZN C -8.97%
UBER C -6.9%
COST B -6.41%
SHOP C -5.37%
DASH C -5.35%
GWW B -5.09%
FAST C -4.11%
BKNG C -4.02%
MA B -3.57%
CPRT D -3.33%
V C -3.26%
MANH B -3.04%
NFLX B -2.33%
META B -2.19%
PDD F -1.86%
ABNB D -1.64%
PLD C -1.32%
FRPT B -1.27%
GLBE C -1.16%
PKG B -1.13%
XPO D -1.12%
ODFL D -1.1%
ADSK C -0.94%
EBAY B -0.93%
GOOGL D -0.88%
EXPE C -0.82%
RBLX B -0.81%
ETSY F -0.75%
SPSC D -0.73%
TTD B -0.71%
JKHY B -0.71%
APP C -0.54%
TRU B -0.54%
GPK B -0.51%
SQ D -0.43%
PYPL B -0.26%
CSGP D -0.22%
Compare ETFs