MCHS vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
MCHS

Matthews China Discovery Active ETF

MCHS Description

Under normal circumstances, the Matthews China Discovery Active ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 65% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of small companies. In addition, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in China. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.68

Average Daily Volume

2,522

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.44

Average Daily Volume

189,704

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MCHS PGJ
30 Days -3.82% -4.97%
60 Days 11.22% 12.88%
90 Days 13.06% 19.61%
12 Months 4.45%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MCHS Weight in PGJ Overlap
ATAT A 2.54% 1.18% 1.18%
BEKE C 2.88% 4.54% 2.88%
BZ F 1.67% 2.57% 1.67%
YMM D 1.95% 3.11% 1.95%
MCHS Overweight 1 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
ACMR F 2.18%
MCHS Underweight 50 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC B -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU F -6.21%
NTES C -3.64%
TME C -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT C -3.26%
LI F -2.65%
QFIN B -2.33%
TAL D -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS A -1.34%
BILI C -1.27%
ATHM C -1.06%
DQ D -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV C -0.65%
MNSO C -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH C -0.45%
WB D -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL B -0.34%
VNET D -0.28%
QD A -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH C -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC B -0.19%
RERE D -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API C -0.15%
DAO C -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA C -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS A -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs