LRNZ vs. CNAV ETF Comparison
Comparison of TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) to Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV)
LRNZ
TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
LRNZ Description
LRNZ seeks to provide total return by investing in an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of companies that are significantly involved in the application of high levels of artificial intelligence. Intends to serve as a more focused alpha seeking solution to complement traditional technology-based indices Targets companies with leading-edge artificial intelligence, machine learning, or deep learning technology platforms, algorithms, or applications that we believe may provide distinct competitive advantages in an industry historically characterized by a winner-take-all consolidation behavior. Portfolio construction begins with a multi-cap investment universe comprised of secular growth companies, cyclical growth companies, and newly public companies. Actively managed by highly credentialed artificial intelligence specialist with deep field experience and robust Silicon Valley network.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$40.29
Average Daily Volume
4,261
19
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
CNAV Description
CNAV scans for opportunities across all 11 sectors of the S&P 500, in attempt to navigate significant market value fluctuations. The portfolio may focus on just 50 stocks and rebalances whenever a holding exceeds 10% of total assets. Stock selection follows a top-down, tactical approach, evaluating price movements of individual stocks and over 117 sub-industries within the S&P 500 index. The fund holds the strongest-performing stocks when industry data trends are favorable. Conversely, when an industry shows a negative trend, it reallocates to other industries or moves into money market funds. Due to frequent trading, the fund is expected to experience a high portfolio turnover rate and is designed for investors who can withstand large principal value fluctuations.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.56
Average Daily Volume
21,592
30
Performance
| Period | LRNZ | CNAV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.34% | 7.65% |
| 60 Days | 6.04% | |
| 90 Days | 3.94% | |
| 12 Months | 25.02% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in LRNZ | Weight in CNAV | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOT | A | 9.31% | 3.4% | 3.4% |
LRNZ Underweight 29 Positions Relative to CNAV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| APP | A | -6.72% | |
| AXON | A | -4.53% | |
| DAY | B | -3.85% | |
| FTNT | B | -3.73% | |
| VRT | A | -3.72% | |
| DASH | A | -3.61% | |
| LW | C | -3.58% | |
| NTNX | B | -3.55% | |
| GPN | C | -3.52% | |
| VST | A | -3.42% | |
| V | A | -3.33% | |
| FFIV | B | -3.28% | |
| CAH | B | -3.27% | |
| TRV | A | -3.24% | |
| WDAY | C | -3.2% | |
| MA | B | -3.16% | |
| DRI | C | -3.08% | |
| CMG | C | -3.07% | |
| DT | C | -3.04% | |
| PGR | B | -3.04% | |
| MCD | D | -2.97% | |
| NOC | D | -2.93% | |
| WFC | A | -2.86% | |
| BLDR | D | -2.83% | |
| SBAC | D | -2.74% | |
| MDLZ | F | -2.71% | |
| NKE | F | -2.7% | |
| CEG | C | -2.62% | |
| ERIE | F | -2.32% |
LRNZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
CNAV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
