LITP vs. SEMI ETF Comparison

Comparison of Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) to Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF (SEMI)

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

LITP Description

The fund will, under normal circumstances, invest at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from mining, exploration, development, or production of lithium. The index generally consists of from 40 to 50 constituents. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$8.55

Average Daily Volume

14,933

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SEMI

Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF

SEMI Description

SEMI is designed to provide exposure to the broad information technology sector by focusing on pure-play companies related to the semiconductor industry. The fund actively and generally invests in 30-50 high-conviction semiconductor or semiconductor-related firms, as defined by GICS, including those under communication equipment, electronic equipment, technology hardware, storage and peripherals, and software. Additionally, the fund requires at least 25% of its assets be invested in companies in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. Security selection is done through extensive in-depth research. SEMI is a non-transparent ETF and does not provide daily disclosure of its portfolio holdings unlike other ETFs. As such, there is a risk that shares of the fund may trade at wider spreads, especially during periods of volatility. The fund instead publishes a trading basket daily, which provides a preview of selected holdings without disclosing the actual portfolio.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.62

Average Daily Volume

3,009

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LITP	SEMI
30 Days	-0.92%	-7.22%
60 Days	23.54%	0.64%
90 Days	25.70%	-3.04%
12 Months	-24.61%	27.03%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in LITP	Weight in SEMI	Overlap

LITP Overweight 5 Positions Relative to SEMI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SQM	D	9.52%
ALB	B	9.3%
SLI	C	2.24%
IONR	C	1.72%
PLL	C	1.38%

LITP Underweight 28 Positions Relative to SEMI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	B	-17.8%
AVGO	C	-15.11%
LRCX	F	-6.56%
ADI	F	-4.55%
ASML	F	-4.49%
AMAT	F	-4.42%
TSM	C	-4.34%
KLAC	F	-4.33%
MPWR	F	-3.9%
NXPI	F	-3.68%
QCOM	F	-3.27%
MCHP	F	-2.95%
AMD	F	-2.83%
MRVL	B	-2.79%
MU	D	-2.59%
TER	F	-2.3%
ON	F	-2.18%
SNPS	B	-1.79%
ARM	D	-1.7%
CDNS	B	-1.4%
TXN	C	-1.0%
QRVO	F	-0.45%
GFS	C	-0.43%
WDC	D	-0.32%
INTC	C	-0.28%
SLAB	F	-0.27%
SWKS	F	-0.23%
MKSI	C	-0.23%

LITP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Other Industrial Metals & Mining Chemicals Industrial Metals & Minerals Specialty Chemicals