LITP vs. PSCT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT)

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

LITP Description

The fund will, under normal circumstances, invest at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from mining, exploration, development, or production of lithium. The index generally consists of from 40 to 50 constituents. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$8.72

Average Daily Volume

14,307

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSCT

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

PSCT Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.00

Average Daily Volume

13,612

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LITP	PSCT
30 Days	4.06%	-1.93%
60 Days	20.11%	-4.10%
90 Days	24.39%	2.81%
12 Months	-24.01%	13.96%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in LITP	Weight in PSCT	Overlap

LITP Overweight 5 Positions Relative to PSCT

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SQM	D	9.57%
ALB	C	8.99%
SLI	A	2.55%
IONR	B	2.2%
PLL	B	1.45%

LITP Underweight 63 Positions Relative to PSCT

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SPSC	F	-4.62%
BMI	D	-3.86%
NSIT	F	-3.85%
MARA	D	-3.5%
ACIW	C	-3.34%
BOX	D	-3.05%
ITRI	A	-2.98%
PI	C	-2.85%
AEIS	A	-2.64%
PLXS	A	-2.57%
IDCC	A	-2.42%
SANM	A	-2.38%
DXC	D	-2.35%
FORM	F	-2.21%
SITM	B	-2.21%
YOU	A	-2.17%
SMTC	B	-2.16%
ENV	A	-2.05%
DIOD	F	-1.95%
BL	B	-1.92%
ACLS	F	-1.91%
PRGS	B	-1.82%
ALRM	F	-1.73%
DOCN	B	-1.7%
PLUS	C	-1.69%
AGYS	D	-1.61%
DV	F	-1.55%
KLIC	B	-1.54%
CALX	D	-1.45%
OSIS	F	-1.42%
VIAV	A	-1.33%
TTMI	A	-1.28%
EXTR	B	-1.23%
WOLF	D	-1.23%
VYX	F	-1.22%
HLIT	F	-1.11%
ROG	D	-1.1%
VECO	F	-1.08%
BHE	A	-1.04%
UCTT	F	-1.03%
RAMP	D	-1.03%
KN	C	-0.99%
PLAB	F	-0.96%
NTCT	C	-0.95%
CTS	A	-0.94%
COHU	B	-0.77%
XRX	F	-0.76%
MXL	D	-0.75%
ARLO	F	-0.71%
DGII	B	-0.71%
ATEN	A	-0.69%
SCSC	F	-0.67%
ICHR	F	-0.59%
PDFS	F	-0.58%
CNXN	F	-0.57%
CXM	F	-0.57%
NABL	F	-0.57%
SEDG	F	-0.57%
VSAT	F	-0.56%
AOSL	D	-0.55%
SWI	B	-0.44%
CEVA	D	-0.36%
CRSR	D	-0.18%

LITP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Other Industrial Metals & Mining Chemicals Industrial Metals & Minerals Specialty Chemicals