LITP vs. PSCT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT)
LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

LITP Description

The fund will, under normal circumstances, invest at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from mining, exploration, development, or production of lithium. The index generally consists of from 40 to 50 constituents. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$8.04

Average Daily Volume

10,012

Number of Holdings *

3

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PSCT

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

PSCT Description The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.96

Average Daily Volume

16,021

Number of Holdings *

61

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LITP PSCT
30 Days -17.37% -0.42%
60 Days -23.86% 0.65%
90 Days -17.79% 3.76%
12 Months -55.58% -1.13%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LITP Weight in PSCT Overlap
LITP Overweight 3 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
ALB F 11.14%
SQM D 10.25%
ALTM F 4.16%
LITP Underweight 61 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
FN C -5.87%
SPSC B -4.58%
BMI C -3.6%
NSIT C -3.59%
MARA C -3.54%
FORM A -3.03%
ITRI C -3.0%
ACLS B -2.99%
ACIW A -2.67%
AEIS C -2.66%
BOX D -2.49%
SANM C -2.39%
DXC C -2.22%
DIOD C -2.15%
ALRM C -2.09%
ENV C -2.06%
IDCC A -1.93%
PLXS D -1.85%
DV D -1.77%
VECO B -1.75%
KLIC B -1.73%
PRFT B -1.73%
BL D -1.62%
PRGS B -1.54%
OSIS C -1.45%
SITM B -1.43%
UCTT A -1.4%
AGYS B -1.36%
CALX C -1.36%
ROG D -1.34%
RAMP C -1.32%
TTMI B -1.3%
PLUS D -1.27%
SMTC C -1.22%
DOCN C -1.2%
EXTR C -1.14%
PLAB D -1.03%
CTS D -1.01%
MXL B -1.0%
VIAV D -1.0%
COHU B -0.99%
KN D -0.99%
SEDG F -0.95%
BHE D -0.93%
XRX F -0.93%
HLIT B -0.9%
NTCT D -0.87%
ICHR B -0.83%
ARLO B -0.83%
SGH B -0.78%
CXM D -0.74%
PDFS B -0.73%
NABL B -0.71%
SCSC D -0.71%
VSAT F -0.64%
ATEN C -0.63%
AOSL B -0.55%
DGII D -0.54%
CNXN D -0.48%
CRSR F -0.33%
CEVA D -0.3%
Compare ETFs