LITP vs. PAWZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) to ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ)
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
LITP Description
The fund will, under normal circumstances, invest at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from mining, exploration, development, or production of lithium. The index generally consists of from 40 to 50 constituents. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$7.00
Average Daily Volume
10,612
Number of Holdings
*
3
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
PAWZ Description
The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the FactSet Pet Care EW Index (the "index"). The fund seeks to invest substantially all of its assets in the stocks that make up the index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index. The index consists of U.S. and international companies that potentially stand to benefit from interest in, resources spent on, pet ownership. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$60.70
Average Daily Volume
5,069
Number of Holdings
*
17
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
| Period | LITP | PAWZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.14% | 7.41% |
| 60 Days | -11.84% | 11.70% |
| 90 Days | -16.77% | 11.77% |
| 12 Months | -54.24% | 31.13% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in LITP | Weight in PAWZ | Overlap |
|---|
LITP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PAWZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
