LGHT vs. CWS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS)
LGHT

Langar Global HealthTech ETF

LGHT Description

LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$10.34

Average Daily Volume

808

Number of Holdings *

31

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CWS

AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF

CWS Description The AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. CWS aims to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in a focused group of U.S. exchange-listed equity securities that the portfolio manager believes have favorable fundamental attributes.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$69.98

Average Daily Volume

10,757

Number of Holdings *

25

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LGHT CWS
30 Days -1.37% 0.56%
60 Days -2.99% 3.12%
90 Days -0.13% 6.07%
12 Months 29.99%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LGHT Weight in CWS Overlap
LGHT Overweight 31 Positions Relative to CWS
Symbol Grade Weight
ISRG A 14.61%
GEHC D 8.88%
RMD C 7.02%
IQV F 6.62%
PHG F 5.08%
DXCM C 4.95%
VEEV B 4.88%
PODD B 4.8%
BNTX D 3.58%
ZBH C 3.47%
ALGN D 2.78%
MASI B 2.42%
MRNA F 2.12%
DOCS B 1.67%
PRCT C 1.39%
ALKS C 0.66%
TNDM F 0.61%
OMCL C 0.47%
IRTC C 0.46%
PRVA B 0.45%
EVH F 0.41%
LFST B 0.33%
PGNY F 0.29%
TDOC C 0.29%
GDRX F 0.21%
ALHC C 0.21%
SDGR C 0.19%
PHR D 0.17%
ACCD F 0.06%
TBRG B 0.03%
MODV D 0.03%
LGHT Underweight 25 Positions Relative to CWS
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B -6.25%
MLR C -5.9%
FI A -5.3%
APH B -4.98%
HEI A -4.75%
AFL C -4.47%
SYK A -4.15%
ICE C -4.11%
COR B -4.09%
MCO C -4.01%
SAIC D -3.99%
SLGN B -3.92%
OTIS D -3.78%
ROL C -3.77%
BR A -3.66%
AGM B -3.65%
INTU A -3.63%
ABT C -3.55%
TMO F -3.51%
AWK D -3.41%
MGRC B -3.39%
FDS A -3.38%
HSY F -3.16%
PII F -2.47%
CE F -1.94%
Compare ETFs