KWEB vs. PGJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KWEB Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign equity securities benchmark. The fund will normally invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of its current benchmark, the CSI Overseas China Internet Index or in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of the investable universe of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary business or businesses are in the Internet and Internet-related sectors. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.16
Average Daily Volume
27,830,621
16
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.87
Average Daily Volume
168,228
54
Performance
| Period | KWEB | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -16.21% | -13.85% |
| 60 Days | 25.18% | 24.20% |
| 90 Days | 25.48% | 30.11% |
| 12 Months | 24.28% | 12.64% |
14 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in KWEB | Weight in PGJ | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATHM | D | 1.18% | 1.06% | 1.06% | |
| BABA | B | 9.92% | 7.61% | 7.61% | |
| BEKE | A | 4.7% | 4.53% | 4.53% | |
| BIDU | F | 3.35% | 6.25% | 3.35% | |
| BILI | A | 3.46% | 1.29% | 1.29% | |
| BZ | C | 2.44% | 2.58% | 2.44% | |
| IQ | C | 0.45% | 0.73% | 0.45% | |
| QFIN | B | 2.99% | 2.51% | 2.51% | |
| TAL | B | 2.92% | 2.36% | 2.36% | |
| TCOM | A | 4.32% | 8.66% | 4.32% | |
| TME | D | 2.86% | 3.6% | 2.86% | |
| VIPS | F | 3.17% | 3.16% | 3.16% | |
| WB | B | 0.5% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
| YMM | B | 3.66% | 3.22% | 3.22% |
KWEB Underweight 40 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JD | A | -9.33% | |
| YUMC | A | -8.3% | |
| ZTO | C | -3.78% | |
| NIO | D | -3.57% | |
| HTHT | B | -3.31% | |
| NTES | F | -3.23% | |
| LI | C | -3.09% | |
| XPEV | B | -1.22% | |
| GDS | B | -1.18% | |
| ATAT | B | -1.12% | |
| ZLAB | B | -0.9% | |
| DQ | A | -0.89% | |
| MOMO | A | -0.65% | |
| FINV | B | -0.64% | |
| RLX | F | -0.62% | |
| MNSO | A | -0.54% | |
| TIGR | B | -0.46% | |
| JKS | A | -0.46% | |
| CSIQ | D | -0.44% | |
| EH | B | -0.42% | |
| DDL | A | -0.28% | |
| VNET | B | -0.26% | |
| SOHU | D | -0.26% | |
| LX | B | -0.25% | |
| GOTU | F | -0.25% | |
| QD | A | -0.25% | |
| NOAH | B | -0.24% | |
| RERE | C | -0.18% | |
| HUYA | D | -0.18% | |
| TUYA | D | -0.11% | |
| DAO | A | -0.1% | |
| KC | B | -0.1% | |
| DADA | C | -0.1% | |
| API | B | -0.09% | |
| DOYU | A | -0.09% | |
| WDH | C | -0.09% | |
| BZUN | B | -0.08% | |
| NIU | B | -0.07% | |
| CAAS | A | -0.07% | |
| CBAT | C | -0.05% |
KWEB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
