KMID vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)

KMID

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF

KMID Description

The fund advisor pursues long-term capital appreciation in the medium capitalization sector while seeking less market risk than the Russell Midcap® Index. The fund advisor invests in medium market capitalization companies believed by Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management, LLC, the fund"s sub-adviser, to be undervalued relative to their future growth potential. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.28

Average Daily Volume

12,790

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.42

Average Daily Volume

191,886

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	KMID	PGJ
30 Days	1.41%	-3.59%
60 Days		14.09%
90 Days		18.85%
12 Months		3.75%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in KMID	Weight in PGJ	Overlap

KMID Overweight 25 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AME	A	6.31%
TDY	B	4.11%
HEI	A	4.06%
EFX	F	3.98%
LII	A	3.97%
WST	C	3.92%
POOL	D	3.92%
ROST	D	3.88%
ODFL	B	3.82%
DPZ	C	3.82%
PNR	B	3.68%
VRSK	A	3.63%
WAB	B	3.57%
BRO	B	3.55%
NDSN	C	3.5%
ROL	B	3.42%
FICO	A	3.28%
BSY	D	3.25%
LPLA	A	3.1%
MSCI	C	2.94%
ALGN	D	2.92%
BR	B	2.92%
FDS	B	2.64%
WRB	A	2.47%
MPWR	F	2.35%

KMID Underweight 54 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
YUMC	B	-9.52%
TCOM	B	-8.84%
JD	D	-8.37%
BABA	D	-7.56%
BIDU	D	-6.21%
BEKE	C	-4.54%
NTES	C	-3.64%
TME	D	-3.6%
ZTO	F	-3.39%
NIO	F	-3.36%
VIPS	F	-3.32%
HTHT	D	-3.26%
YMM	C	-3.11%
LI	F	-2.65%
BZ	F	-2.57%
QFIN	A	-2.33%
TAL	F	-2.25%
XPEV	C	-1.55%
GDS	C	-1.34%
BILI	D	-1.27%
ATAT	C	-1.18%
ATHM	C	-1.06%
DQ	C	-0.87%
ZLAB	C	-0.77%
MOMO	D	-0.68%
RLX	C	-0.67%
IQ	F	-0.67%
FINV	B	-0.65%
MNSO	C	-0.53%
JKS	D	-0.48%
CSIQ	F	-0.45%
EH	C	-0.45%
WB	C	-0.44%
TIGR	D	-0.43%
DDL	B	-0.34%
VNET	C	-0.28%
QD	B	-0.27%
LX	C	-0.26%
SOHU	F	-0.25%
NOAH	C	-0.24%
GOTU	F	-0.23%
KC	A	-0.19%
RERE	C	-0.18%
HUYA	F	-0.17%
API	B	-0.15%
DAO	B	-0.11%
DOYU	C	-0.11%
TUYA	D	-0.11%
WDH	C	-0.1%
DADA	F	-0.09%
BZUN	F	-0.07%
CAAS	B	-0.07%
NIU	F	-0.06%
CBAT	F	-0.05%