JHMU vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

JHMU

John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF

JHMU Description

The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.32

Average Daily Volume

2,088

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$133.74

Average Daily Volume

9,397

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	JHMU	PRN
30 Days	1.06%	-1.97%
60 Days	1.30%	-2.34%
90 Days	1.75%	-4.44%
12 Months		30.20%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in JHMU	Weight in PRN	Overlap

JHMU Overweight 10 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AEP	C	6.02%
DUK	C	5.11%
XEL	D	4.99%
SRE	B	4.92%
SO	B	4.69%
EXC	D	4.12%
ED	D	4.12%
EIX	C	4.09%
PEG	B	3.94%
DTE	D	3.83%

JHMU Underweight 40 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HEI	B	-4.35%
CTAS	A	-4.31%
VRT	C	-3.71%
FIX	D	-3.67%
TT	B	-3.6%
CPRT	C	-3.5%
PWR	D	-3.48%
HUBB	C	-3.35%
AME	D	-3.21%
GWW	C	-2.84%
STRL	D	-2.76%
HWM	C	-2.73%
TDG	D	-2.72%
SAIA	C	-2.67%
CSL	C	-2.66%
URI	D	-2.6%
AMSC	B	-2.6%
PKG	C	-2.56%
DY	B	-2.43%
ETN	C	-2.38%
BLDR	F	-2.34%
GGG	D	-2.22%
WIRE	A	-2.2%
AXON	C	-2.09%
XPO	C	-2.06%
CSWI	A	-2.03%
IESC	C	-1.92%
HRI	F	-1.8%
CBZ	D	-1.79%
APG	C	-1.78%
BCC	F	-1.73%
GFF	D	-1.69%
MYRG	F	-1.64%
UFPI	D	-1.64%
AIT	C	-1.62%
GMS	D	-1.54%
ARCB	D	-1.54%
RUSHA	F	-1.44%
CMPR	B	-1.37%
HEES	F	-1.01%

JHMU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Utilities - Regulated Electric Utilities - Diversified