JHAC vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
JHAC

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

JHAC Description

Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities. Market capitalizations of these companies will span the capitalization spectrum. Equity securities include exchange-traded common and preferred securities (and exchange-traded futures providing such exposure). The manager seeks to identify companies that demonstrate key growth drivers, sustainable cash flow production, and high returns on capital, sustainable competitive advantages, and strong management.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$15.02

Average Daily Volume

992

Number of Holdings *

41

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.98

Average Daily Volume

256,894

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period JHAC QLTY
30 Days 2.46% -1.78%
60 Days 6.79% -0.84%
90 Days 8.57% 1.81%
12 Months 37.61% 26.10%
9 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in JHAC Weight in QLTY Overlap
AAPL C 4.2% 5.33% 4.2%
AMZN B 8.0% 2.4% 2.4%
CRM A 2.68% 2.84% 2.68%
ELV F 1.74% 2.5% 1.74%
GOOGL B 5.62% 4.43% 4.43%
MSFT D 1.01% 6.46% 1.01%
ORCL A 1.72% 4.71% 1.72%
TMO D 0.72% 0.91% 0.72%
TXN C 1.76% 3.53% 1.76%
JHAC Overweight 32 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA B 6.24%
LEN D 4.77%
MS A 3.84%
KKR A 3.79%
FHB A 3.52%
LNG A 3.48%
ADI D 3.3%
CCI D 3.13%
WDAY B 2.81%
GS A 2.56%
URI B 2.55%
GPI A 2.08%
SPGI C 2.06%
PH A 1.95%
HOLX D 1.82%
RRX B 1.69%
BUD F 1.41%
ROP C 1.36%
ADSK B 1.32%
PII F 1.25%
AVTR F 1.13%
AXTA A 1.1%
LVS C 0.96%
NVR D 0.95%
CARG A 0.93%
MTN C 0.93%
WBD B 0.79%
ELAN C 0.54%
MRNA F 0.53%
ST F 0.34%
AMT D 0.21%
FPH C 0.14%
JHAC Underweight 25 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
META C -4.5%
JNJ D -4.24%
ABT B -4.17%
UNH B -3.62%
ACN C -3.3%
V A -3.22%
PG C -3.2%
ISRG A -2.92%
KLAC F -2.85%
LRCX F -2.85%
KO D -2.81%
HLT A -2.62%
ARMK C -2.56%
WFC A -2.45%
AVGO C -2.45%
MRK F -2.41%
USB B -2.31%
OTIS D -2.25%
TJX A -2.14%
GE D -1.73%
MDLZ F -1.72%
LLY F -1.61%
STZ D -1.59%
CI D -1.49%
DGX A -1.35%
Compare ETFs