IPDP vs. VIRS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS)
IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$19.57

Average Daily Volume

989

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
VIRS

Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF

VIRS Description An exchange traded fund (ETF) that seeks to track the LifeSci BioThreat Strategy Index to invest in U.S. listed companies whose products or services help to protect against, endure or recover from biological threats to human health. The index aims to: Research of current and future pandemics. Combat agents of biological warfare. Detect the presence of biological threats. Secure national borders and ports and strengthen homeland security. Aid in stockpiling of products needed in times of natural disasters and disease outbreaks. Improve food and water safety and purity. Enable technology to benefit work and stay at home mandates.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.93

Average Daily Volume

270

Number of Holdings *

51

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period IPDP VIRS
30 Days 2.20% 3.01%
60 Days 12.31% 9.88%
90 Days 8.91% 10.06%
12 Months 35.13% 35.62%
6 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in IPDP Weight in VIRS Overlap
A B 1.72% 1.39% 1.39%
ABT C 2.02% 4.92% 2.02%
ECL C 2.06% 2.49% 2.06%
HD A 2.26% 5.18% 2.26%
JNJ D 1.97% 5.0% 1.97%
MRK F 1.65% 4.01% 1.65%
IPDP Overweight 43 Positions Relative to VIRS
Symbol Grade Weight
AVGO B 2.37%
MSI A 2.29%
AAPL C 2.23%
CTAS C 2.22%
TT A 2.19%
HNI B 2.19%
HIG A 2.15%
BRO A 2.14%
CAH B 2.13%
BRC C 2.13%
CSCO A 2.09%
UNH B 2.08%
AIT B 2.08%
ACN B 2.07%
TRV B 2.06%
HPQ B 2.06%
ADP A 2.04%
GWW B 2.02%
SYK C 2.02%
ABM D 2.01%
MMC D 2.0%
AMP A 1.99%
APOG B 1.96%
SNA C 1.94%
RGA B 1.94%
DOV C 1.91%
SEIC B 1.9%
AOS C 1.9%
KLAC B 1.89%
CSX D 1.86%
ETN B 1.84%
APH D 1.83%
DCI B 1.82%
IEX D 1.81%
WTS C 1.81%
ELV F 1.79%
GPC D 1.75%
TROW D 1.72%
UPS D 1.72%
MCK F 1.62%
NSP F 1.59%
LECO D 1.56%
QCOM D 1.56%
IPDP Underweight 45 Positions Relative to VIRS
Symbol Grade Weight
WMT A -5.5%
LOW C -5.16%
NFLX A -4.89%
SNY C -4.88%
DHR D -4.76%
TMO D -4.75%
AMZN C -4.74%
NVDA B -4.24%
REGN D -3.9%
GILD A -3.5%
GSK F -2.83%
PLTR A -2.82%
MMM C -2.58%
CVS D -2.52%
HLN C -1.62%
KMB D -1.62%
KR C -1.41%
XYL C -1.11%
MTD C -1.04%
BNTX B -0.95%
VLTO A -0.94%
CHD D -0.86%
MRNA F -0.83%
ZM B -0.72%
BAH C -0.71%
TDY A -0.7%
WAT B -0.69%
ILMN B -0.69%
CLX C -0.69%
HRL F -0.59%
DGX D -0.58%
AKAM D -0.52%
CPB D -0.51%
SOLV C -0.41%
QGEN F -0.34%
WBA F -0.24%
SRCL B -0.19%
OGN F -0.17%
NEOG F -0.12%
ENR B -0.07%
SCL D -0.06%
FTRE F -0.06%
TDOC D -0.05%
VIR F -0.04%
EBS D -0.01%
Compare ETFs