IPDP vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$18.18

Average Daily Volume

2,131

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.32

Average Daily Volume

231,158

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period IPDP QLTY
30 Days 1.02% 5.49%
60 Days 2.76% 7.41%
90 Days -0.95% 7.67%
12 Months 19.39%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in IPDP Weight in QLTY Overlap
AAPL A 2.27% 3.44% 2.27%
ABT D 2.02% 3.42% 2.02%
ACN C 2.0% 3.73% 2.0%
JNJ F 1.92% 3.99% 1.92%
UNH D 1.89% 4.88% 1.89%
IPDP Overweight 44 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
AVGO B 2.31%
MCK B 2.16%
KLAC B 2.14%
ABM B 2.13%
HPQ C 2.13%
MSI B 2.11%
HD C 2.09%
CAH D 2.09%
ECL B 2.08%
SYK C 2.06%
CTAS B 2.05%
HNI B 2.03%
CSCO D 2.03%
TT B 2.03%
MMC A 2.03%
APH B 2.03%
HIG C 2.03%
MRK C 2.01%
BRO B 2.0%
APOG C 1.99%
TROW C 1.99%
AMP B 1.99%
BRC B 1.98%
ELV C 1.98%
CSX D 1.97%
RGA B 1.97%
AIT B 1.96%
QCOM B 1.95%
AOS D 1.95%
TRV D 1.94%
DOV D 1.93%
DCI D 1.93%
UPS F 1.91%
SEIC C 1.91%
GWW C 1.9%
SNA F 1.9%
ETN C 1.89%
ADP D 1.89%
IEX F 1.86%
GPC F 1.86%
NSP F 1.8%
WTS D 1.74%
A D 1.73%
LECO F 1.67%
IPDP Underweight 5 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT A -7.48%
GOOGL A -4.13%
ORCL A -3.94%
META B -3.73%
AMZN A -3.54%
Compare ETFs