HQGO vs. TYLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) to Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG)

HQGO

Hartford US Quality Growth ETF

HQGO Description

The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of the Index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.03

Average Daily Volume

Number of Holdings ^*

125

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

TYLG

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF

TYLG Description

The index measures the performance of a partially covered call strategy that holds a theoretical portfolio of the securities of the Information Technology Select Sector Index. The fund invests in the securities reflected in theindex or in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of such component securities and cannot invest directly in the index itself. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.67

Average Daily Volume

2,422

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	HQGO	TYLG
30 Days	4.87%	2.61%
60 Days	5.44%	5.38%
90 Days	7.05%	5.86%
12 Months		22.78%

36 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in HQGO	Weight in TYLG	Overlap
AAPL	C	4.46%	6.71%	4.46%
ACN	C	0.87%	1.12%	0.87%
ADBE	C	0.95%	1.1%	0.95%
ADSK	A	0.61%	0.34%	0.34%
AMAT	F	0.7%	0.71%	0.7%
ANET	C	0.41%	0.49%	0.41%
AVGO	D	1.77%	1.93%	1.77%
CDNS	B	1.21%	0.42%	0.42%
CDW	F	0.15%	0.12%	0.12%
CSCO	B	0.38%	1.16%	0.38%
CTSH	B	0.54%	0.19%	0.19%
DELL	C	0.18%	0.19%	0.18%
FFIV	B	0.28%	0.07%	0.07%
FICO	B	1.42%	0.26%	0.26%
FTNT	C	0.65%	0.29%	0.29%
HPQ	B	0.67%	0.18%	0.18%
INTU	C	0.4%	0.92%	0.4%
IT	C	0.71%	0.19%	0.19%
KEYS	A	0.29%	0.15%	0.15%
KLAC	D	0.47%	0.41%	0.41%
LRCX	F	0.42%	0.46%	0.42%
MPWR	F	0.07%	0.14%	0.07%
MSFT	F	3.75%	5.95%	3.75%
MSI	B	0.71%	0.41%	0.41%
NOW	A	0.71%	1.04%	0.71%
NTAP	C	1.05%	0.12%	0.12%
NVDA	C	6.09%	6.92%	6.09%
NXPI	D	0.54%	0.28%	0.28%
ON	D	0.12%	0.14%	0.12%
PANW	C	0.09%	0.63%	0.09%
PLTR	B	0.02%	0.63%	0.02%
QCOM	F	0.87%	0.86%	0.86%
SNPS	B	0.66%	0.43%	0.43%
TER	D	0.44%	0.09%	0.09%
TXN	C	0.24%	0.91%	0.24%
VRSN	F	0.65%	0.07%	0.07%

HQGO Overweight 89 Positions Relative to TYLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GOOGL	C	4.79%
AMZN	C	4.24%
META	D	3.11%
WMT	A	2.12%
V	A	2.09%
HD	A	2.02%
MA	C	2.0%
UNH	C	1.93%
COST	B	1.92%
XOM	B	1.91%
PG	A	1.87%
JNJ	D	1.73%
ABBV	D	1.6%
APP	B	1.59%
MRK	F	1.54%
EOG	A	1.49%
LLY	F	1.49%
SHW	A	1.17%
GWW	B	1.17%
DBX	B	1.16%
BKNG	A	1.07%
TSLA	B	1.07%
BLDR	D	1.03%
TEAM	A	0.94%
CVLT	B	0.84%
BRK.A	B	0.79%
DOCU	A	0.76%
FAST	B	0.73%
LOW	D	0.71%
RPM	A	0.64%
RHI	B	0.64%
HUBS	A	0.64%
CTAS	B	0.62%
MTD	D	0.62%
LULU	C	0.59%
APPF	B	0.55%
ALKS	B	0.52%
EA	A	0.52%
TJX	A	0.51%
RS	B	0.46%
MTCH	D	0.45%
ANF	C	0.44%
Z	A	0.43%
IDXX	F	0.42%
VLTO	D	0.39%
WSM	B	0.38%
LNTH	D	0.37%
MANH	D	0.37%
NKE	D	0.36%
ORLY	B	0.36%
KR	B	0.36%
CSGP	D	0.36%
NTNX	A	0.34%
DECK	A	0.3%
GILD	C	0.3%
PSTG	D	0.28%
INCY	C	0.28%
BBY	D	0.27%
TGT	F	0.25%
EXEL	B	0.24%
SMAR	A	0.24%
AZO	C	0.23%
CHX	C	0.23%
CL	D	0.19%
GAP	C	0.19%
CRUS	D	0.18%
ITW	B	0.18%
MAS	D	0.17%
WFRD	D	0.16%
DDOG	A	0.15%
AYI	B	0.15%
LAMR	D	0.15%
ZTS	D	0.15%
PINS	D	0.15%
SBAC	D	0.15%
ULTA	F	0.13%
LSCC	D	0.13%
QLYS	C	0.13%
RL	B	0.08%
BBWI	D	0.07%
JPM	A	0.06%
LSTR	D	0.06%
NYT	C	0.06%
ACLS	F	0.06%
TSCO	D	0.06%
ACI	C	0.05%
PPG	F	0.05%
APA	D	0.02%
GPC	D	0.01%

HQGO Underweight 32 Positions Relative to TYLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CRM	B	-1.59%
ORCL	B	-1.53%
AMD	F	-1.12%
IBM	C	-0.99%
MU	D	-0.55%
ADI	D	-0.52%
INTC	D	-0.51%
APH	A	-0.43%
CRWD	B	-0.41%
ROP	B	-0.3%
MCHP	D	-0.18%
GLW	B	-0.18%
TYL	B	-0.14%
HPE	B	-0.14%
ANSS	B	-0.14%
GDDY	A	-0.13%
TDY	B	-0.12%
PTC	A	-0.11%
FSLR	F	-0.1%
STX	D	-0.1%
WDC	D	-0.1%
ZBRA	B	-0.1%
TRMB	B	-0.09%
GEN	B	-0.08%
EPAM	C	-0.07%
AKAM	D	-0.07%
SWKS	F	-0.07%
JBL	B	-0.07%
JNPR	F	-0.06%
SMCI	F	-0.06%
ENPH	F	-0.04%
QRVO	F	-0.03%