HIPS vs. EATZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Master Income ETF (HIPS) to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)
HIPS
Master Income ETF
HIPS Description
The Master Income ETF seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the TFMS HIPS 300 Index. The Index is constructed to capture 300 high income securities, typically with pass-through structures, across the following sectors: (i) closed-end funds (“CEFs”), (ii) mortgage real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), (iii) commercial equity REITs, (iv) residential/diversified REITs, (v) asset management and business development companies (“BDCs”), and (vi) energy production and energy transportation & processing companies. Energy-related companies included in the Index are expected to primarily be structured as master limited partnerships (“MLPs”). CEFs included in the Index are limited to taxable, debt-based funds and may include CEFs that invest primarily in bank loans, high-yield securities (also known as “junk bonds”), foreign securities (including those in emerging markets), and mortgage- or asset-backed securities. The Index is constituted using proprietary methodology developed by Trust and Fiduciary Management Services, Inc. The Index Provider determines the relative weightings of the securities in the Index and publishes information regarding the market value of the Index.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$13.04
Average Daily Volume
31,473
37
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.73
Average Daily Volume
2,005
21
Performance
| Period | HIPS | EATZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.25% | 5.39% |
| 60 Days | 1.38% | 8.91% |
| 90 Days | 3.36% | 13.99% |
| 12 Months | 19.42% | 39.96% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in HIPS | Weight in EATZ | Overlap |
|---|
HIPS Overweight 37 Positions Relative to EATZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BGX | A | 2.79% | |
| LTC | B | 2.79% | |
| JQC | A | 2.78% | |
| JFR | A | 2.75% | |
| ARCC | A | 2.72% | |
| ET | A | 2.68% | |
| SLRC | A | 2.66% | |
| FSK | A | 2.65% | |
| EFT | A | 2.64% | |
| EPD | A | 2.64% | |
| FCT | A | 2.63% | |
| FDUS | A | 2.62% | |
| BXSL | A | 2.62% | |
| BLW | C | 2.6% | |
| MPLX | A | 2.6% | |
| DMLP | A | 2.6% | |
| GTY | A | 2.59% | |
| CQP | B | 2.56% | |
| GBDC | B | 2.55% | |
| NBB | D | 2.54% | |
| KRP | B | 2.53% | |
| DSU | A | 2.52% | |
| ALX | D | 2.49% | |
| PAA | B | 2.48% | |
| SBRA | B | 2.48% | |
| WES | C | 2.48% | |
| GLPI | C | 2.48% | |
| OHI | C | 2.46% | |
| USAC | B | 2.44% | |
| BSM | B | 2.44% | |
| PK | D | 2.41% | |
| EPR | D | 2.28% | |
| NMFC | D | 2.26% | |
| GSBD | F | 2.2% | |
| NNN | C | 2.18% | |
| NHS | D | 2.02% | |
| GNL | D | 1.83% |
HIPS Underweight 21 Positions Relative to EATZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | A | -7.2% | |
| TXRH | B | -6.48% | |
| BROS | A | -6.28% | |
| CAKE | B | -5.82% | |
| WING | F | -5.36% | |
| YUMC | B | -5.22% | |
| LOCO | D | -4.8% | |
| USFD | A | -4.77% | |
| ARMK | B | -4.67% | |
| DIN | C | -4.64% | |
| PFGC | B | -4.56% | |
| CASY | A | -4.45% | |
| DPZ | C | -4.35% | |
| SYY | D | -4.33% | |
| DRI | C | -4.17% | |
| SGBX | F | -3.94% | |
| STKS | F | -3.87% | |
| CMG | C | -2.42% | |
| YUM | D | -1.63% | |
| MCD | D | -1.45% | |
| SHAK | C | -1.44% |
HIPS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
