HACK vs. PSCU ETF Comparison
Comparison of ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio (PSCU)
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
HACK Description
The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the component securities in the index. The index tracks the performance of the exchange-listed equity securities of companies across the globe that (i) engage in providing cybersecurity applications or services as a vital component of its overall business or (ii) provide hardware or software for cybersecurity activities as a vital component of its overall business.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$71.11
Average Daily Volume
68,469
23
PSCU
PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio
PSCU Description
The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Utilities & Telecom Services Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US utilities and telecommunication services companies. These companies are principally engaged in providing either energy, water or natural gas utilities, as well as services designed to promote or enhance the transmission of voice, data and video over various communications media, including wireline, wireless (terrestrial-based), satellite and cable. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$63.75
Average Daily Volume
3,933
35
Performance
| Period | HACK | PSCU |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.34% | 4.22% |
| 60 Days | 4.61% | 5.99% |
| 90 Days | 5.26% | 10.02% |
| 12 Months | 29.18% | 27.17% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in HACK | Weight in PSCU | Overlap |
|---|
HACK Overweight 23 Positions Relative to PSCU
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | C | 9.71% | |
| CSCO | B | 7.55% | |
| PANW | B | 6.25% | |
| CRWD | B | 6.08% | |
| FTNT | B | 5.84% | |
| GD | D | 5.33% | |
| NOC | D | 4.95% | |
| LDOS | C | 4.51% | |
| NET | B | 4.17% | |
| BAH | D | 3.87% | |
| ZS | B | 3.81% | |
| GEN | B | 3.79% | |
| FFIV | B | 3.74% | |
| CYBR | A | 3.29% | |
| S | B | 3.29% | |
| CHKP | D | 3.24% | |
| OKTA | D | 3.12% | |
| QLYS | C | 2.97% | |
| RBRK | A | 2.57% | |
| VRNS | D | 2.53% | |
| TENB | D | 2.5% | |
| RPD | C | 2.27% | |
| FSLY | F | 1.94% |
HACK Underweight 35 Positions Relative to PSCU
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUMN | C | -11.14% | |
| MGEE | A | -4.59% | |
| MSGS | B | -4.46% | |
| MDU | D | -4.36% | |
| CNK | A | -4.15% | |
| IAC | D | -4.04% | |
| OTTR | C | -3.97% | |
| CCOI | B | -3.96% | |
| CARG | B | -3.89% | |
| AWR | A | -3.82% | |
| TDS | B | -3.66% | |
| TGNA | B | -3.63% | |
| CWT | C | -3.55% | |
| AVA | C | -3.52% | |
| CPK | A | -3.36% | |
| SATS | C | -3.26% | |
| ZD | B | -3.05% | |
| YELP | C | -3.03% | |
| CWEN | C | -2.62% | |
| CABO | C | -2.2% | |
| SJW | F | -1.95% | |
| NWN | A | -1.91% | |
| TRIP | F | -1.85% | |
| QNST | C | -1.44% | |
| MSEX | B | -1.42% | |
| CARS | C | -1.4% | |
| UTL | C | -1.14% | |
| CWEN | C | -1.03% | |
| TTGT | B | -0.96% | |
| SSTK | F | -0.92% | |
| SCHL | F | -0.79% | |
| SHEN | F | -0.7% | |
| THRY | F | -0.59% | |
| GOGO | C | -0.57% | |
| CNSL | B | -0.42% |
HACK: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PSCU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
