GSST vs. LVOL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) to American Century Low Volatility ETF (LVOL)

GSST

Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF

GSST Description

The investment seeks to provide current income with preservation of capital. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes (measured at the time of purchase) ("Net Assets") in a broad range of U.S. dollar denominated bonds. It will concentrate its investments in the financial services group of industries. Under normal circumstances, the fund's effective duration is expected to be one year or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.36

Average Daily Volume

136,216

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

LVOL

American Century Low Volatility ETF

LVOL Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund generally invests in common stocks of U.S. companies that have a market capitalization greater than $2 billion. It seeks to deliver a lower realized portfolio volatility than its benchmark, the S&P 500® Index, by utilizing a stock selection process that expands on traditional measures of price volatility by including measures of asymmetric volatility and seeking securities of businesses that demonstrate consistent cash-flows, stable operations, and strong balance sheets. The fund is an actively managed ETF that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.33

Average Daily Volume

276

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GSST	LVOL
30 Days	0.31%	1.68%
60 Days	1.04%	4.66%
90 Days	1.70%	3.75%
12 Months	5.45%	24.43%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in GSST	Weight in LVOL	Overlap
ABBV	C	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%
MCO	D	0.13%	0.84%	0.13%
ROP	D	0.14%	0.76%	0.14%

GSST Overweight 59 Positions Relative to LVOL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	C	0.88%
CI	D	0.72%
DFS	A	0.64%
NVR	C	0.64%
CCEP	D	0.59%
FN	B	0.49%
SO	C	0.48%
T	B	0.46%
BMO	B	0.45%
KIND	D	0.44%
HSBC	A	0.43%
CM	C	0.43%
PSA	C	0.43%
VZ	C	0.4%
JXN	A	0.4%
BNS	C	0.37%
MS	A	0.37%
UBS	A	0.36%
BAC	B	0.35%
DTE	C	0.35%
EQH	B	0.35%
BIIB	F	0.34%
R	B	0.33%
ICE	B	0.31%
SCHW	C	0.31%
TD	A	0.31%
CNP	B	0.27%
DUK	D	0.26%
RY	B	0.25%
DLTR	F	0.25%
FIS	A	0.25%
GILD	A	0.23%
AIG	C	0.23%
MMM	C	0.22%
C	B	0.22%
CRPT	B	0.2%
MKL	D	0.19%
PL	D	0.19%
PPL	C	0.19%
AEP	D	0.19%
ETR	B	0.18%
NWG	A	0.17%
MPLX	B	0.16%
BABA	A	0.16%
FITB	C	0.15%
NEE	D	0.15%
CSL	A	0.14%
ATO	B	0.13%
RL	B	0.13%
MPC	C	0.13%
HPE	B	0.13%
AL	F	0.11%
PFG	B	0.11%
GM	C	0.1%
COMM	C	0.1%
VOYA	A	0.08%
OGE	C	0.07%
GNR	B	0.05%
BX	C	0.03%

GSST Underweight 93 Positions Relative to LVOL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSFT	D	-7.85%
AAPL	D	-6.81%
V	C	-3.0%
JNJ	D	-2.84%
PG	D	-2.71%
ACN	B	-2.67%
CSCO	A	-2.67%
HD	A	-2.63%
BRK.A	C	-2.53%
MA	B	-2.43%
LIN	D	-2.34%
GOOGL	C	-2.18%
AMZN	C	-2.04%
COST	D	-1.98%
KO	D	-1.92%
MMC	D	-1.88%
MDT	C	-1.83%
MRK	F	-1.76%
CTAS	C	-1.75%
APH	D	-1.72%
CTSH	C	-1.47%
SPGI	C	-1.46%
INTU	F	-1.38%
ABT	B	-1.34%
PEP	F	-1.31%
MCD	B	-1.3%
DOX	B	-1.3%
PAYX	B	-1.29%
CB	D	-1.21%
HON	C	-1.2%
CMI	A	-1.1%
BSX	A	-1.08%
RSG	D	-1.0%
SHW	C	-0.99%
PTC	D	-0.98%
GD	C	-0.95%
CL	D	-0.94%
WM	D	-0.89%
ECL	C	-0.86%
MSI	A	-0.83%
ITW	C	-0.79%
DOV	C	-0.76%
GOOG	C	-0.73%
ADSK	C	-0.71%
IBM	A	-0.67%
HIG	C	-0.67%
EA	D	-0.67%
SYK	D	-0.66%
TDY	B	-0.64%
AMP	A	-0.62%
KMB	D	-0.56%
NDSN	C	-0.56%
TRV	C	-0.5%
GWW	B	-0.49%
FAST	C	-0.48%
YUM	C	-0.45%
IT	B	-0.45%
VRSK	D	-0.44%
OTIS	A	-0.41%
CMCSA	C	-0.4%
WMT	C	-0.36%
SNA	C	-0.33%
LOW	B	-0.3%
BR	B	-0.29%
NTAP	B	-0.29%
FI	A	-0.27%
HOLX	D	-0.22%
PKG	B	-0.22%
AVY	D	-0.2%
MAS	B	-0.2%
DLB	D	-0.2%
CRM	B	-0.2%
MDLZ	D	-0.2%
VRSN	D	-0.19%
IEX	D	-0.18%
ZBH	F	-0.17%
FDS	C	-0.17%
JKHY	B	-0.16%
FFIV	B	-0.15%
LLY	D	-0.14%
ORLY	A	-0.13%
CW	B	-0.11%
CDW	D	-0.11%
AJG	D	-0.1%
AON	B	-0.1%
AXP	A	-0.1%
ITT	B	-0.09%
CHE	D	-0.08%
GGG	C	-0.08%
LSTR	F	-0.08%
DCI	C	-0.08%
AVB	D	-0.06%
VLTO	A	-0.04%