GK vs. MID ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) to American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID)
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
GK Description
GK seeks to provide a broad thematic exposure by actively investing in a growth-focused portfolio of US companies across a variety of long-term macro trends. It uses a multi-thematic approach to concentrate on disruptive investment themes while ensuring diversification across holdings. In selecting stocks, the fund adviser uses a three-part system which involves fundamental, technical, and qualitative analysis on firms that could benefit from long-term changes in the market. The funds investments may be of any market capitalization and may focus on innovative companies related to renewable energy and sustainable transportation, technology frontiers, video gaming and Esports, cannabis, online gambling, top consumer brands, pet and animal wellness, real estate disruption, healthcare and biotechnology, and the media industry. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$22.19
Average Daily Volume
3,394
30
MID
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
MID Description
The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$61.60
Average Daily Volume
4,813
40
Performance
| Period | GK | MID |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.92% | -0.79% |
| 60 Days | 4.46% | 1.60% |
| 90 Days | 4.50% | 5.19% |
| 12 Months | 28.56% | 31.96% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in GK | Weight in MID | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONON | B | 1.38% | 2.07% | 1.38% |
GK Overweight 29 Positions Relative to MID
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | A | 8.86% | |
| MSFT | D | 7.4% | |
| NFLX | A | 6.55% | |
| AAPL | C | 6.39% | |
| TT | A | 5.6% | |
| LEN | D | 5.05% | |
| BX | A | 5.01% | |
| DIS | B | 4.88% | |
| NVO | F | 4.35% | |
| GOOG | B | 4.25% | |
| AMZN | B | 4.09% | |
| IBIT | A | 3.94% | |
| MGM | D | 3.75% | |
| AVGO | C | 3.52% | |
| ORCL | A | 3.46% | |
| HD | A | 2.7% | |
| DELL | B | 2.15% | |
| SYK | A | 1.81% | |
| WMT | A | 1.8% | |
| UBER | F | 1.63% | |
| LPLA | A | 1.61% | |
| ASML | F | 1.47% | |
| GD | D | 1.38% | |
| AMD | F | 1.38% | |
| VICI | C | 1.07% | |
| LLY | F | 1.0% | |
| FLUT | A | 0.91% | |
| TSLA | A | 0.53% | |
| REGN | F | 0.42% |
GK Underweight 39 Positions Relative to MID
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSCI | B | -5.64% | |
| ESI | B | -4.85% | |
| DUOL | A | -4.55% | |
| MPWR | F | -4.05% | |
| POOL | D | -4.0% | |
| AVNT | B | -3.95% | |
| BFAM | F | -3.94% | |
| NET | B | -3.77% | |
| LII | A | -3.48% | |
| MANH | D | -3.47% | |
| RSG | A | -3.45% | |
| CMG | C | -3.05% | |
| CDW | F | -2.72% | |
| CHD | A | -2.72% | |
| HUBB | B | -2.71% | |
| CDNS | B | -2.63% | |
| TRGP | A | -2.44% | |
| VST | A | -2.37% | |
| ENPH | F | -2.26% | |
| IDXX | F | -2.16% | |
| NTRA | A | -2.07% | |
| XYL | D | -1.93% | |
| ABNB | D | -1.9% | |
| EFX | F | -1.86% | |
| ALNY | D | -1.78% | |
| COR | B | -1.74% | |
| ARGX | B | -1.69% | |
| TPG | A | -1.6% | |
| IQV | F | -1.59% | |
| NU | C | -1.53% | |
| PODD | B | -1.5% | |
| VRT | A | -1.48% | |
| CNM | C | -1.37% | |
| DXCM | C | -1.33% | |
| GEHC | D | -1.27% | |
| TECH | F | -1.07% | |
| BLD | F | -0.98% | |
| AZEK | B | -0.98% | |
| J | D | -0.87% |
GK: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
MID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
