FNDF vs. CIL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) to Compass EMP International 500 Volatility Weighted Index ETF (CIL)

FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

FNDF Description

The investment seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. The index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size - adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks - rather than market capitalization. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the index. It may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.85

Average Daily Volume

775,093

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CIL

Compass EMP International 500 Volatility Weighted Index ETF

CIL Description

Compass EMP Funds Trust - Compass EMP International 500 Volatility Weighted Index ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Victory Capital Management Inc. The fund invests in public equity markets of developed countries across the globe excluding the United States. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. The fund invests in volatile stocks of large-cap companies. It seeks to track the performance of the CEMP International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Compass EMP Funds Trust - Compass EMP International 500 Volatility Weighted Index ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.81

Average Daily Volume

1,575

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FNDF	CIL
30 Days	-2.49%	-2.46%
60 Days	-7.17%	-6.22%
90 Days	-5.30%	-3.42%
12 Months	9.45%	11.84%

23 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in FNDF	Weight in CIL	Overlap
ABBV	D	0.22%	0.22%	0.22%
BCS	C	0.42%	0.19%	0.19%
CNI	F	0.19%	0.28%	0.19%
DEO	F	0.17%	0.26%	0.17%
E	F	0.43%	0.26%	0.26%
FLUT	A	0.05%	0.18%	0.05%
GOLD	D	0.16%	0.13%	0.13%
HMC	F	0.57%	0.11%	0.11%
HSBH	B	0.79%	0.23%	0.23%
KB	B	0.18%	0.12%	0.12%
LOGI	D	0.04%	0.17%	0.04%
LYG	F	0.34%	0.21%	0.21%
MFG	B	0.27%	0.14%	0.14%
MUFG	C	0.48%	0.15%	0.15%
NMR	B	0.08%	0.12%	0.08%
NVS	D	0.59%	0.25%	0.25%
SHG	D	0.18%	0.12%	0.12%
SMFG	C	0.39%	0.14%	0.14%
SONY	B	0.48%	0.15%	0.15%
TD	F	0.42%	0.28%	0.28%
TM	F	1.24%	0.12%	0.12%
UL	D	0.56%	0.28%	0.28%
WCN	A	0.07%	0.37%	0.07%

FNDF Overweight 28 Positions Relative to CIL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
STLA	F	0.35%
MT	D	0.28%
MDT	D	0.23%
KEP	B	0.11%
WFG	C	0.1%
AGCO	D	0.09%
BNTX	C	0.09%
ZIM	C	0.07%
SW	B	0.07%
TT	A	0.06%
NXPI	D	0.06%
LPL	F	0.06%
APTV	F	0.04%
AER	A	0.03%
OTEX	D	0.03%
GRMN	B	0.03%
LULU	C	0.03%
KT	A	0.03%
SKM	C	0.03%
ALLE	D	0.02%
ARM	D	0.02%
TEVA	D	0.02%
PRGO	C	0.02%
TIGO	D	0.02%
CCEP	B	0.02%
CHKP	D	0.02%
ALV	C	0.02%
ICLR	F	0.01%

FNDF Underweight 2 Positions Relative to CIL

	Symbol	Grade	Weight
	RBA	B	-0.21%
	XRX	F	-0.19%