FFTY vs. MCHS ETF Comparison
Comparison of Innovator IBD 50 Fund ETF (FFTY) to Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS)
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 Fund ETF
FFTY Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in companies included in the IBD® 50 Index. It is actively managed. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest in a portfolio of U.S.-listed, exchange-traded equities. FFTY picks 50 leading growth companies that trade on US exchanges, potentially including ADRs. After screening out securities with extreme recent price movements, the universe is ranked by a composite of 11 different fundamental and technical metrics. The top 50 stocks are weighted in tiers, with more weight given to higher-ranking companies. Components of the index are reviewed on a weekly basis. Based on market-wide technical signals, FFTY may substitute half of its equity portfolio with Treasury bills. The index will remain half equity, half T-bills until a reversal signal occurs. Its worth noting that the funds high-turnover strategy could lead to poor tracking and/or taxable capital gains payouts.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.76
Average Daily Volume
74,777
50
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
MCHS Description
Under normal circumstances, the Matthews China Discovery Active ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 65% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in the common and preferred stocks of small companies. In addition, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, which includes borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in the common and preferred stocks of companies located in China. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.16
Average Daily Volume
2,541
5
Performance
| Period | FFTY | MCHS |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 11.41% | -3.69% |
| 60 Days | 13.97% | 13.13% |
| 90 Days | 16.25% | 15.15% |
| 12 Months | 37.05% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in FFTY | Weight in MCHS | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATAT | C | 3.46% | 2.6% | 2.6% |
FFTY Overweight 49 Positions Relative to MCHS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIMS | B | 3.77% | |
| POWL | C | 3.6% | |
| NVDA | B | 3.59% | |
| VRT | B | 3.58% | |
| STRL | A | 3.57% | |
| FIX | A | 3.52% | |
| PLTR | B | 3.47% | |
| DOCS | C | 3.28% | |
| ARM | F | 3.22% | |
| CLS | A | 3.21% | |
| YOU | D | 3.09% | |
| NTRA | A | 3.05% | |
| BWIN | C | 3.0% | |
| ANET | C | 3.0% | |
| EME | A | 2.99% | |
| HROW | D | 2.95% | |
| DUOL | A | 2.92% | |
| BGNE | D | 2.79% | |
| ADMA | B | 2.77% | |
| IOT | A | 2.07% | |
| MNDY | C | 2.05% | |
| CWAN | B | 2.03% | |
| RCL | A | 2.01% | |
| FTAI | A | 2.01% | |
| RYAN | A | 1.99% | |
| LNTH | D | 1.99% | |
| IBKR | A | 1.99% | |
| AXON | A | 1.99% | |
| ONON | A | 1.92% | |
| AFRM | A | 1.12% | |
| TT | A | 1.0% | |
| MELI | C | 1.0% | |
| VITL | D | 0.99% | |
| TW | A | 0.99% | |
| NOW | A | 0.99% | |
| FOUR | A | 0.99% | |
| TVTX | C | 0.98% | |
| HWM | A | 0.97% | |
| NFLX | A | 0.96% | |
| PACS | F | 0.51% | |
| KVYO | C | 0.51% | |
| FTNT | C | 0.51% | |
| ALNY | D | 0.51% | |
| AGX | B | 0.5% | |
| DY | D | 0.49% | |
| DECK | A | 0.49% | |
| AMSC | B | 0.49% | |
| TOST | B | 0.48% | |
| ZETA | D | 0.46% |
FFTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
MCHS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
