FBCV vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)

FBCV

Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF

FBCV Description

The investment seeks long-term growth of capital. Normally the fund invests at least 80% of assets in blue chip companies (companies that, in Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC's (FMR) view, are well-known, well-established and well-capitalized), which generally have large or medium market capitalizations. It invests in companies that manager believes are undervalued in the marketplace in relation to factors such as assets, sales, earnings, growth potential, or cash flow, or in relation to securities of other companies in the same industry (stocks of these companies are often called "value" stocks). The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.68

Average Daily Volume

14,558

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.01

Average Daily Volume

5,177

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FBCV	XHS
30 Days	1.25%	-4.19%
60 Days	8.66%	-0.63%
90 Days	9.99%	5.93%
12 Months	24.02%	15.56%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in FBCV	Weight in XHS	Overlap
CI	D	2.89%	1.9%	1.9%
CNC	F	2.27%	1.96%	1.96%
CVS	D	1.27%	2.04%	1.27%
ELV	F	1.44%	1.89%	1.44%
UNH	B	2.87%	1.94%	1.94%

FBCV Overweight 76 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
XOM	A	4.59%
JPM	C	4.05%
BAC	B	2.94%
CMCSA	B	2.87%
BRK.A	B	2.72%
TRV	B	2.7%
PCG	C	2.34%
DIS	D	2.28%
WFC	B	2.27%
CSCO	A	2.05%
BLK	A	1.98%
AZN	D	1.93%
HRB	C	1.83%
CB	A	1.74%
DE	C	1.72%
JNJ	D	1.7%
BMY	A	1.62%
KVUE	C	1.6%
EIX	C	1.38%
CTSH	B	1.37%
PNC	C	1.35%
KO	C	1.33%
NOC	B	1.32%
WTW	C	1.22%
DOX	B	1.17%
LMT	A	1.14%
KDP	C	1.13%
PG	D	1.12%
SNY	C	1.08%
FDX	F	1.04%
PNR	C	1.02%
MTB	A	0.96%
LOW	C	0.95%
ROST	D	0.95%
CF	A	0.92%
USFD	C	0.92%
USB	C	0.89%
HLN	C	0.88%
NTRS	B	0.88%
APO	A	0.8%
RRX	B	0.79%
NGG	D	0.77%
CCI	D	0.74%
CCEP	C	0.72%
TSN	D	0.72%
EQNR	D	0.72%
MDLZ	D	0.71%
OXY	D	0.7%
CCK	C	0.7%
SRE	C	0.69%
BJ	B	0.69%
JCI	C	0.68%
LHX	A	0.63%
NEE	C	0.62%
MMS	C	0.61%
OVV	D	0.6%
AR	C	0.58%
DEO	C	0.57%
MU	D	0.55%
AES	C	0.51%
MUSA	D	0.42%
SPG	A	0.42%
G	A	0.39%
SO	A	0.37%
CMI	A	0.33%
BA	F	0.29%
OTEX	D	0.28%
TPR	B	0.27%
GEV	A	0.26%
CFR	B	0.23%
TEL	D	0.2%
AVGO	B	0.18%
OSK	F	0.18%
NXPI	F	0.17%
CHRW	C	0.15%
ALSN	A	0.12%

FBCV Underweight 52 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	C	-2.14%
AGL	F	-2.12%
EHC	C	-2.09%
CHE	D	-2.09%
SGRY	C	-2.08%
UHS	D	-2.07%
HCA	C	-2.05%
THC	D	-2.04%
RDNT	C	-2.04%
ADUS	D	-2.03%
HQY	B	-2.02%
HSIC	D	-2.02%
DGX	D	-2.01%
AMED	D	-2.01%
RCM	B	-2.01%
DVA	C	-1.99%
PDCO	F	-1.97%
SEM	D	-1.96%
PINC	F	-1.96%
HUM	F	-1.95%
OPCH	F	-1.95%
CAH	B	-1.94%
ENSG	D	-1.94%
ACHC	F	-1.94%
MOH	F	-1.9%
MCK	F	-1.85%
OMI	F	-1.82%
AMN	F	-1.81%
BKD	F	-1.73%
GH	F	-1.7%
PRVA	F	-1.67%
USPH	F	-1.52%
CRVL	C	-1.47%
PGNY	F	-1.39%
ASTH	B	-1.3%
NEO	F	-1.29%
AHCO	D	-1.23%
PETQ	A	-1.16%
LFST	C	-1.15%
CLOV	B	-1.12%
CSTL	B	-1.08%
MD	B	-1.04%
NHC	D	-0.96%
ALHC	C	-0.95%
CYH	C	-0.92%
CCRN	F	-0.8%
PNTG	C	-0.74%
ACCD	F	-0.66%
OPK	D	-0.57%
FLGT	F	-0.47%
MODV	F	-0.37%
NRC	F	-0.35%