ECML vs. FITE ETF Comparison

Comparison of EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) to SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE)

ECML

EA Series Trust Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

ECML Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in U.S. equity securities that the sub-adviser believes are under-valued and under-appreciated by the market. The sub-adviser employs a quantitative and systematic approach to long-term investing. It is expected that the fund will generally hold 60 to 70 stocks that are selected from a universe that includes all publicly traded stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the Nasdaq Market ("Nasdaq").

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.91

Average Daily Volume

1,192

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITE Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Future Security sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$67.40

Average Daily Volume

4,134

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ECML	FITE
30 Days	3.22%	3.11%
60 Days	3.02%	8.37%
90 Days	5.78%	9.22%
12 Months	25.26%	32.63%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in ECML	Weight in FITE	Overlap
	SANM	B	1.75%	1.31%	1.31%

ECML Overweight 59 Positions Relative to FITE

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MLI	B	2.33%
ALSN	B	2.23%
HSII	B	2.2%
CALM	A	2.1%
TOL	B	1.98%
INGR	B	1.88%
PPC	B	1.87%
TMHC	C	1.85%
GRBK	D	1.83%
CEIX	B	1.82%
GPI	B	1.82%
STLD	B	1.76%
KBH	D	1.75%
FOXA	B	1.75%
HCC	B	1.73%
OSK	C	1.71%
PHM	D	1.7%
LNG	A	1.7%
MHO	D	1.68%
CMC	B	1.68%
PRDO	B	1.68%
GIII	F	1.68%
SM	C	1.67%
OVV	B	1.67%
ARCH	B	1.65%
ATKR	D	1.65%
SIRI	D	1.65%
EOG	A	1.63%
TPH	D	1.62%
MO	A	1.62%
OC	A	1.62%
COKE	C	1.6%
PCAR	C	1.59%
TEX	D	1.58%
COP	B	1.58%
NUE	D	1.57%
PLAB	C	1.54%
DDS	B	1.53%
LEN	D	1.52%
VLO	C	1.49%
BCC	C	1.49%
HESM	A	1.48%
DVN	F	1.48%
AMR	C	1.47%
DHI	D	1.47%
MTH	D	1.47%
ANDE	F	1.46%
CF	A	1.45%
AN	D	1.45%
MOH	F	1.43%
IMKTA	C	1.43%
MPC	C	1.39%
DINO	D	1.38%
LBRT	F	1.38%
ARW	D	1.32%
BG	D	1.32%
INSW	F	1.23%
FOR	F	1.21%
LPG	F	1.17%

ECML Underweight 59 Positions Relative to FITE

Symbol	Grade	Weight
RKLB	B	-5.8%
FTNT	B	-2.32%
S	C	-2.19%
FFIV	A	-2.1%
PSN	D	-2.08%
KTOS	C	-1.94%
LDOS	C	-1.92%
MOG.A	B	-1.88%
CSCO	B	-1.86%
PANW	A	-1.8%
OII	B	-1.8%
NET	B	-1.79%
VRNS	D	-1.79%
TDY	B	-1.76%
NOC	D	-1.75%
NTCT	C	-1.75%
LMT	D	-1.74%
HEI	A	-1.74%
LHX	B	-1.71%
ATEN	A	-1.68%
RTX	D	-1.67%
CYBR	A	-1.67%
AVGO	D	-1.66%
MIR	A	-1.66%
COHR	B	-1.64%
MRCY	C	-1.61%
ZS	C	-1.6%
CHKP	C	-1.6%
OSPN	A	-1.58%
OSIS	A	-1.57%
RDWR	B	-1.56%
DDOG	A	-1.55%
RPD	C	-1.55%
JNPR	D	-1.54%
QLYS	C	-1.54%
IRDM	F	-1.51%
ERJ	B	-1.49%
ZD	B	-1.49%
AKAM	F	-1.44%
AVAV	C	-1.44%
TENB	D	-1.44%
CACI	D	-1.43%
HXL	F	-1.36%
CRWD	B	-1.28%
OKTA	D	-1.26%
DCO	B	-1.22%
KBR	F	-1.22%
BRKR	F	-1.21%
GD	D	-1.2%
APH	B	-1.18%
TXT	D	-1.14%
BA	D	-1.1%
NABL	F	-1.09%
VREX	B	-1.01%
HII	F	-0.94%
MVIS	F	-0.84%
PL	B	-0.83%
VSAT	F	-0.8%
MASS	F	-0.12%