EATZ vs. COWS ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.00
Average Daily Volume
1,821
21
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
COWS Description
COWS is an index tracking fund utilizing a replication strategy. The index strategy aims to invest in US stocks of companies perceived to be stable and pay dividends. The starting investment universe considers the 1000 most liquid US-listed companies, excluding the financial sector. Filtering this universe, the 100 highest ranked free cash flow yielding stocks, as measured by equally weighting the stocks average trailing and forward cash flow yield. Companies with no forward estimates for free cash flow yields or earnings are removed. The investment universe is then filtered to identify dividend paying stocks with three years of uninterrupted dividend growth. Stocks with a payout ratio greater than 75% are eliminated. The top 10% of dividend yielding stocks are selected for the index. This process results in 40-100 stocks being selected and initially equally weighted in the index. Industry exposure is capped at 24%. Index holdings are reconstituted and rebalanced on a quarterly basis.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.24
Average Daily Volume
7,015
53
Performance
Period | EATZ | COWS |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -0.11% | -1.62% |
60 Days | 6.29% | -0.72% |
90 Days | 14.05% | 4.59% |
12 Months | 41.82% | 23.96% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in COWS | Overlap |
---|
EATZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to COWS
EATZ Underweight 53 Positions Relative to COWS
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
VST | B | -3.66% | |
SNA | A | -2.85% | |
OC | B | -2.68% | |
CMCSA | A | -2.58% | |
BC | C | -2.54% | |
TKR | C | -2.52% | |
CF | B | -2.49% | |
FNF | C | -2.47% | |
EBAY | D | -2.44% | |
SLB | F | -2.4% | |
MRO | C | -2.38% | |
G | C | -2.35% | |
HAL | F | -2.34% | |
WSM | F | -2.33% | |
FDX | C | -2.27% | |
TPR | A | -2.19% | |
SWKS | F | -2.09% | |
NXST | A | -2.09% | |
SM | F | -2.06% | |
PARA | C | -2.02% | |
BMY | A | -1.96% | |
PVH | C | -1.96% | |
ALSN | A | -1.93% | |
PTEN | F | -1.9% | |
BEN | B | -1.83% | |
VLO | F | -1.83% | |
ASO | F | -1.77% | |
MUR | F | -1.75% | |
NOV | F | -1.74% | |
MGY | C | -1.71% | |
GAP | D | -1.68% | |
BBWI | F | -1.67% | |
T | A | -1.66% | |
PR | F | -1.65% | |
OGN | D | -1.56% | |
MTDR | D | -1.56% | |
DVN | F | -1.53% | |
AEO | F | -1.51% | |
OLN | F | -1.46% | |
BWA | D | -1.38% | |
TMUS | B | -1.38% | |
LEA | F | -1.38% | |
AYI | A | -1.34% | |
VNT | B | -1.33% | |
CSCO | B | -1.32% | |
IPG | F | -1.32% | |
DNB | B | -1.31% | |
RL | B | -1.29% | |
OSK | C | -1.28% | |
MCK | C | -1.24% | |
SAIC | A | -1.23% | |
INGR | C | -1.17% | |
ENS | F | -1.17% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
COWS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords