DEEP vs. FCLD ETF Comparison

Comparison of Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) to Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD)

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

DEEP Description

The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Acquirers Deep Value Index (the “index”). The index was established in 2020 by Acquirers Funds LLC and tracks the performance of a portfolio of 20 of the most undervalued, fundamentally strong stocks drawn from the largest 500 stocks listed in the United States meeting certain liquidity thresholds. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.29

Average Daily Volume

3,317

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FCLD

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF

FCLD Description

The fund seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index. Normally investing at least 80% of assets in securities included in the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index and in depositary receipts representing securities included in the index. The Fidelity Cloud Computing Index is designed to reflect the performance of a global universe of companies across the market capitalization spectrum that provide products or services enabling the increased adoption of cloud computing, characterized by the delivery of computing services over the internet

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.01

Average Daily Volume

12,854

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	DEEP	FCLD
30 Days	0.40%	6.73%
60 Days	1.23%	13.53%
90 Days	1.91%	15.40%
12 Months	12.28%	34.25%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in DEEP	Weight in FCLD	Overlap

DEEP Overweight 96 Positions Relative to FCLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SMLR	B	1.54%
ARCH	B	1.26%
RYI	B	1.23%
IGIC	A	1.22%
PGC	A	1.22%
MCFT	B	1.21%
HSII	B	1.16%
HLF	C	1.15%
BMRC	A	1.15%
METC	C	1.14%
WTI	F	1.14%
RCMT	C	1.13%
TTEC	F	1.11%
BBW	B	1.11%
BSIG	A	1.1%
HCKT	A	1.1%
FF	F	1.09%
MBUU	C	1.09%
PLAB	D	1.08%
PRDO	B	1.08%
PFBC	A	1.08%
BXC	B	1.08%
VBTX	A	1.08%
VSTO	A	1.08%
PLPC	B	1.07%
DXLG	C	1.06%
DMLP	A	1.06%
NRP	A	1.06%
LPRO	C	1.06%
OFLX	C	1.05%
INMD	C	1.05%
BHLB	A	1.05%
MED	D	1.04%
GPRK	C	1.04%
UPBD	B	1.04%
NX	C	1.04%
ITRN	C	1.02%
WINA	B	1.02%
AMPY	D	1.01%
BKE	A	1.01%
WGO	B	1.01%
NVEC	D	1.01%
HELE	C	1.01%
RMAX	D	1.0%
IRWD	D	1.0%
EPM	A	1.0%
HTBK	A	0.99%
MOV	C	0.99%
INVA	C	0.99%
DAC	B	0.99%
USNA	C	0.99%
SMP	C	0.99%
LESL	C	0.99%
DHIL	A	0.98%
NATR	B	0.98%
UAN	B	0.97%
GIII	D	0.97%
UTMD	D	0.97%
SD	F	0.97%
WLKP	A	0.97%
KFRC	D	0.96%
SWBI	D	0.95%
XPEL	B	0.95%
SBH	A	0.95%
DHT	D	0.95%
WNC	C	0.95%
RGR	F	0.95%
IMKTA	C	0.94%
WRLD	D	0.93%
RMR	F	0.93%
ODP	F	0.92%
AMCX	C	0.92%
LEGH	D	0.92%
CLFD	F	0.9%
NRC	F	0.89%
JOUT	F	0.89%
NUS	C	0.88%
DFIN	D	0.88%
HZO	F	0.88%
AMN	F	0.87%
ETD	D	0.87%
JBSS	F	0.87%
IIIN	C	0.87%
SIGA	F	0.86%
CRCT	F	0.86%
GIC	F	0.85%
RGP	F	0.85%
TH	C	0.85%
PARR	D	0.83%
HOV	F	0.81%
CCRN	F	0.8%
HVT	F	0.79%
MYE	F	0.79%
LPG	F	0.77%
ASC	F	0.71%
HDSN	F	0.67%

DEEP Underweight 48 Positions Relative to FCLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CRM	A	-5.14%
MSTR	B	-4.92%
ORCL	A	-4.92%
NOW	B	-4.68%
INTU	A	-4.27%
MSFT	D	-3.85%
EQIX	B	-3.15%
TEAM	A	-3.1%
DLR	A	-2.92%
HUBS	A	-2.76%
WDAY	B	-2.75%
SNOW	C	-2.63%
DDOG	B	-2.54%
TWLO	A	-2.4%
HPE	B	-2.37%
ZM	B	-2.21%
NTAP	D	-1.99%
DAY	B	-1.96%
MDB	C	-1.93%
NTNX	A	-1.91%
FFIV	B	-1.88%
WDC	F	-1.84%
STX	D	-1.77%
XRX	F	-1.75%
PSTG	F	-1.74%
DT	C	-1.67%
CFLT	C	-1.64%
ESTC	C	-1.52%
CVLT	B	-1.49%
DBX	C	-1.42%
GTLB	B	-1.34%
PEGA	B	-1.26%
PATH	D	-1.24%
BOX	B	-1.2%
FIVN	C	-1.19%
RNG	B	-1.18%
VERX	A	-1.14%
AI	C	-1.1%
TDC	F	-1.0%
FROG	C	-0.99%
SMCI	F	-0.91%
PD	C	-0.88%
DOCN	D	-0.88%
VRNT	D	-0.77%
FSLY	D	-0.75%
INFA	F	-0.7%
VNET	D	-0.65%
SWI	B	-0.64%