CZA vs. EMLP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA) to First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP)

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$108.06

Average Daily Volume

3,105

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

EMLP

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund

EMLP Description

The investment seeks total return. The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowing for investment purposes) in equity securities of companies deemed by the sub-advisor to be engaged in the energy infrastructure sector. These companies principally include publicly-traded master limited partnerships and limited liability companies taxed as partnerships ("MLPs"), MLP affiliates, Canadian income trusts and their successor companies, pipeline companies, utilities, and other companies. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.23

Average Daily Volume

164,271

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CZA	EMLP
30 Days	3.50%	5.25%
60 Days	11.55%	11.72%
90 Days	11.78%	13.15%
12 Months	30.96%	38.19%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CZA	Weight in EMLP	Overlap
AEE	A	1.54%	0.29%	0.29%
DTE	B	1.77%	1.16%	1.16%
ETR	A	1.84%	1.42%	1.42%

CZA Overweight 91 Positions Relative to EMLP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIG	A	2.29%
WAB	A	2.13%
AVB	C	2.12%
PPG	D	2.11%
LYB	B	2.06%
WTW	C	1.99%
BRO	A	1.99%
EQR	C	1.86%
FTV	C	1.85%
VLTO	A	1.82%
STT	A	1.75%
ES	D	1.59%
CHKP	A	1.47%
CPAY	A	1.44%
WRB	C	1.44%
LDOS	A	1.44%
CSL	A	1.42%
CINF	A	1.41%
TDY	A	1.39%
BAH	C	1.37%
PFG	A	1.33%
WLK	C	1.29%
BAX	D	1.29%
PKG	B	1.25%
NTRS	B	1.23%
AER	C	1.2%
FOX	B	1.19%
AVY	D	1.18%
LPLA	D	1.17%
EG	A	1.11%
SUI	D	1.1%
IEX	D	1.09%
J	F	1.09%
RPM	A	1.06%
WMG	D	1.05%
SN	A	1.03%
TRMB	B	1.02%
NI	A	1.01%
UDR	C	0.99%
GGG	C	0.98%
GLPI	C	0.94%
BAP	A	0.94%
RNR	A	0.93%
ACM	A	0.93%
LOGI	D	0.92%
REG	C	0.9%
EMN	C	0.88%
FLEX	B	0.88%
CNA	D	0.87%
ITT	C	0.82%
NVT	C	0.78%
PFGC	A	0.78%
EPAM	F	0.77%
RRX	B	0.75%
CACI	A	0.74%
ATR	A	0.71%
QGEN	F	0.7%
WWD	C	0.7%
AIZ	B	0.69%
HII	F	0.68%
SKX	B	0.67%
BWXT	A	0.65%
EGP	D	0.6%
INGR	B	0.6%
CR	A	0.6%
SEIC	B	0.6%
WEX	C	0.58%
ALSN	A	0.55%
AWI	A	0.55%
MOS	F	0.54%
IVZ	A	0.52%
VOYA	A	0.52%
COLD	D	0.52%
G	A	0.47%
BPOP	D	0.47%
LFUS	C	0.45%
BLCO	C	0.45%
ESNT	A	0.45%
ESAB	C	0.44%
OSK	F	0.44%
ACT	B	0.38%
RRR	D	0.38%
PFSI	C	0.38%
MDU	C	0.37%
SLGN	B	0.37%
VNT	F	0.35%
FNB	D	0.34%
FELE	C	0.33%
FLO	D	0.32%
SEM	D	0.29%
ZGN	F	0.26%

CZA Underweight 47 Positions Relative to EMLP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EPD	A	-8.19%
ET	A	-6.72%
OKE	A	-5.1%
KMI	A	-4.63%
PAGP	B	-4.59%
SRE	C	-4.06%
DTM	A	-4.05%
MPLX	B	-3.87%
TRGP	A	-3.08%
NFG	A	-3.01%
PEG	A	-2.82%
PPL	C	-2.57%
AEP	C	-2.38%
PWR	A	-2.32%
WMB	A	-2.16%
ATO	A	-1.78%
LNT	B	-1.75%
LNG	A	-1.45%
WEC	B	-1.38%
CMS	A	-1.28%
XEL	C	-1.27%
VST	A	-1.24%
EVRG	C	-1.21%
AES	C	-1.2%
SUN	D	-1.16%
OGS	C	-1.13%
FLR	B	-1.11%
CQP	D	-0.85%
WLKP	D	-0.82%
NEP	D	-0.82%
DUK	C	-0.76%
CNP	B	-0.66%
HESM	C	-0.66%
WTRG	D	-0.62%
CWEN	C	-0.57%
AROC	B	-0.53%
D	A	-0.53%
SO	A	-0.5%
IDA	D	-0.49%
NJR	C	-0.47%
CEG	A	-0.32%
CPK	C	-0.25%
USAC	D	-0.12%
EXC	C	-0.11%
UGI	C	-0.08%
AWK	D	-0.06%
ENLC	A	-0.0%