CQQQ vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim China Technology ETF (CQQQ) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
CQQQ

Guggenheim China Technology ETF

CQQQ Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an equity index called the AlphaShares China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in common stock, ADRs, ADSs, GDRs and IDRs that comprise the index and depositary receipts or shares representing common stocks included in the index. The index is designed to measure and monitor the performance of the universe of publicly-traded companies which are based in mainland China, Hong Kong or Macau, are in the Information Technology Sector, as defined by GICS and are open to foreign investment. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.64

Average Daily Volume

509,353

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.54

Average Daily Volume

192,476

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CQQQ PGJ
30 Days -2.33% -5.37%
60 Days 26.13% 13.12%
90 Days 25.16% 17.78%
12 Months 10.05% 2.29%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CQQQ Weight in PGJ Overlap
ATHM C 1.24% 1.06% 1.06%
BIDU F 5.35% 6.21% 5.35%
BILI D 3.96% 1.27% 1.27%
GDS C 1.66% 1.34% 1.34%
WB D 0.46% 0.44% 0.44%
CQQQ Overweight 2 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
PDD F 7.32%
YY B 0.79%
CQQQ Underweight 49 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC C -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BEKE D -4.54%
NTES D -3.64%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN A -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
ATAT C -1.18%
DQ F -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO D -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH D -0.45%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL C -0.34%
VNET B -0.28%
QD B -0.27%
LX B -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH D -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC B -0.19%
RERE C -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API B -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA D -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS C -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs