BSMC vs. PSCU ETF Comparison

Comparison of Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio (PSCU)

BSMC

Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF

BSMC Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to attain its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities of U.S. companies with small- and mid-market capitalizations (market value of publicly traded equity securities).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.08

Average Daily Volume

8,896

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSCU

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio

PSCU Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Capped Utilities & Telecom Services Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US utilities and telecommunication services companies. These companies are principally engaged in providing either energy, water or natural gas utilities, as well as services designed to promote or enhance the transmission of voice, data and video over various communications media, including wireline, wireless (terrestrial-based), satellite and cable. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.39

Average Daily Volume

4,833

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BSMC	PSCU
30 Days	0.35%	4.14%
60 Days	0.06%	5.56%
90 Days	4.31%	10.43%
12 Months	21.53%	26.94%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in BSMC	Weight in PSCU	Overlap
	SCHL	F	1.03%	0.79%	0.79%

BSMC Overweight 62 Positions Relative to PSCU

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DOX	D	3.16%
NTGR	A	3.0%
PINC	B	2.77%
ERJ	A	2.6%
EPC	D	2.35%
TAP	B	2.16%
IPGP	D	2.13%
HCSG	B	2.08%
CFG	A	2.07%
DGX	A	2.07%
MD	B	1.96%
UNF	B	1.89%
NPK	C	1.84%
IPG	F	1.78%
IFF	F	1.74%
INGR	B	1.73%
TXT	D	1.73%
EQC	A	1.7%
KMT	B	1.66%
SXT	C	1.61%
OMF	A	1.6%
SEIC	A	1.58%
MOG.A	B	1.55%
FFIV	B	1.55%
GRFS	C	1.54%
PAHC	B	1.52%
IMKTA	C	1.51%
ELAN	D	1.49%
UTHR	C	1.42%
QRVO	F	1.29%
SHC	D	1.21%
FTRE	D	1.19%
SMG	D	1.19%
WTW	B	1.18%
STT	A	1.12%
WHR	A	1.11%
PBH	A	1.1%
ORI	A	1.1%
XRAY	F	1.09%
LEVI	F	1.06%
OGN	F	1.06%
PHG	F	1.05%
KNX	B	1.02%
WKC	D	0.99%
SON	D	0.98%
SEB	F	0.96%
LANC	D	0.92%
WMK	B	0.91%
ARLO	D	0.88%
WTM	A	0.88%
CPB	D	0.87%
AVT	C	0.86%
MCY	A	0.86%
CNA	C	0.83%
SEE	D	0.83%
ZBH	C	0.76%
SKX	F	0.74%
ARW	D	0.72%
HSIC	C	0.71%
KELYA	F	0.67%
LSTR	D	0.41%
HTLD	B	0.33%

BSMC Underweight 34 Positions Relative to PSCU

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LUMN	C	-11.14%
MGEE	A	-4.59%
MSGS	B	-4.46%
MDU	D	-4.36%
CNK	A	-4.15%
IAC	F	-4.04%
OTTR	C	-3.97%
CCOI	B	-3.96%
CARG	A	-3.89%
AWR	A	-3.82%
TDS	B	-3.66%
TGNA	B	-3.63%
CWT	D	-3.55%
AVA	C	-3.52%
CPK	A	-3.36%
SATS	D	-3.26%
ZD	B	-3.05%
YELP	C	-3.03%
CWEN	C	-2.62%
CABO	C	-2.2%
SJW	F	-1.95%
NWN	A	-1.91%
TRIP	D	-1.85%
QNST	C	-1.44%
MSEX	B	-1.42%
CARS	B	-1.4%
UTL	D	-1.14%
CWEN	C	-1.03%
TTGT	C	-0.96%
SSTK	F	-0.92%
SHEN	F	-0.7%
THRY	F	-0.59%
GOGO	C	-0.57%
CNSL	B	-0.42%