BLCV vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)

BLCV

BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF

BLCV Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in large cap equity securities and derivatives that have similar economic characteristics to such securities. The fund invests primarily in equity securities that BFA believes are undervalued, which means that their prices are less than BFA believes they are worth. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.26

Average Daily Volume

3,570

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.44

Average Daily Volume

4,017

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BLCV	XHS
30 Days	1.94%	-0.01%
60 Days	3.72%	-2.53%
90 Days	3.69%	-4.43%
12 Months	26.46%	10.84%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in BLCV	Weight in XHS	Overlap
CAH	B	3.19%	2.24%	2.24%
CI	D	1.85%	1.86%	1.85%
CVS	D	2.24%	1.99%	1.99%
ELV	F	1.06%	1.55%	1.06%
LH	B	2.07%	2.26%	2.07%

BLCV Overweight 51 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WFC	A	4.18%
C	A	3.58%
SSNC	B	2.94%
CSCO	B	2.79%
LHX	C	2.73%
FCNCA	A	2.62%
MDT	D	2.5%
CMCSA	B	2.48%
LDOS	C	2.4%
CTSH	B	2.3%
ICE	C	2.23%
AMZN	C	2.23%
MSFT	D	2.2%
FIS	C	2.19%
EA	A	2.08%
BAX	F	1.99%
DNB	B	1.98%
EPD	A	1.96%
JCI	B	1.95%
GM	C	1.94%
RTX	D	1.85%
WAB	B	1.79%
SRE	A	1.76%
HES	B	1.62%
KHC	F	1.59%
HPQ	B	1.58%
EXC	C	1.58%
CCI	C	1.51%
D	C	1.44%
AIG	B	1.41%
PPG	F	1.37%
VZ	C	1.36%
KOS	D	1.33%
APD	A	1.32%
WDC	D	1.32%
STZ	D	1.21%
APTV	F	1.2%
FNF	B	1.18%
WTW	B	1.14%
KDP	F	1.12%
V	A	1.11%
TPR	B	1.05%
IFF	D	1.02%
LLY	F	0.98%
BTI	B	0.93%
DLTR	F	0.9%
SEE	C	0.81%
BA	F	0.79%
DG	F	0.59%
VOYA	B	0.49%
FTRE	D	0.42%

BLCV Underweight 53 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	B	-2.63%
HQY	A	-2.56%
RDNT	B	-2.5%
MCK	A	-2.46%
GH	B	-2.36%
PINC	B	-2.35%
EHC	B	-2.27%
SEM	B	-2.21%
DGX	A	-2.13%
RCM	A	-2.12%
COR	B	-2.12%
THC	D	-2.1%
PRVA	C	-2.1%
UNH	B	-2.09%
CHE	D	-2.05%
ENSG	C	-2.0%
DVA	C	-1.98%
HSIC	C	-1.98%
ADUS	D	-1.96%
AMED	F	-1.95%
PDCO	F	-1.87%
HUM	C	-1.84%
HCA	F	-1.83%
UHS	D	-1.81%
MOH	F	-1.79%
USPH	B	-1.7%
SGRY	F	-1.67%
CRVL	B	-1.65%
CNC	D	-1.63%
BKD	F	-1.48%
OMI	F	-1.48%
NEO	C	-1.45%
OPCH	D	-1.45%
MD	C	-1.41%
AHCO	F	-1.25%
CLOV	D	-1.25%
CSTL	D	-1.24%
LFST	B	-1.24%
PGNY	F	-1.21%
ALHC	C	-1.14%
AMN	F	-1.06%
ACHC	F	-1.05%
NHC	C	-1.02%
ASTH	F	-1.01%
AGL	F	-1.01%
PNTG	D	-0.71%
ACCD	D	-0.64%
OPK	C	-0.64%
CYH	F	-0.63%
CCRN	F	-0.59%
MODV	C	-0.52%
FLGT	F	-0.42%
NRC	F	-0.31%