BLCV vs. FFLC ETF Comparison

Comparison of BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC)

BLCV

BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF

BLCV Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to invest at least 80% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in large cap equity securities and derivatives that have similar economic characteristics to such securities. The fund invests primarily in equity securities that BFA believes are undervalued, which means that their prices are less than BFA believes they are worth. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.26

Average Daily Volume

3,570

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FFLC

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF

FFLC Description

FFLC seeks to achieve long-term capital growth by investing in a global core equity portfolio of large-cap stocks. The adviser generally defines large caps as companies with similar market capitalizations to Russell 1000 or S&P 500 companies. Stocks are selected using fundamental analysis of factors such as financial condition and industry position of each issuer, as well as market and economic conditions. The adviser then incorporates a quantitative portfolio construction process to emphasize securities in which the adviser has high conviction, subject to risk, liquidity, and trading characteristics. The portfolio includes stocks with growth and/or value characteristics. Despite its large-cap focus, the fund's strategy can lead to investments in small- and mid-cap companies. Before February 26, 2024, the fund traded as Fidelity New Millennium ETF under the ticker FMIL. The fund previously used a semitransparent ETF structure.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$47.14

Average Daily Volume

101,737

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BLCV	FFLC
30 Days	1.94%	1.03%
60 Days	3.72%	3.95%
90 Days	3.69%	6.08%
12 Months	26.46%	37.00%

12 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in BLCV	Weight in FFLC	Overlap
AMZN	C	2.23%	2.89%	2.23%
BA	F	0.79%	0.72%	0.72%
CCI	C	1.51%	0.61%	0.61%
CI	D	1.85%	1.23%	1.23%
CMCSA	B	2.48%	1.69%	1.69%
CSCO	B	2.79%	1.1%	1.1%
ELV	F	1.06%	0.63%	0.63%
KDP	F	1.12%	1.0%	1.0%
LLY	F	0.98%	1.85%	0.98%
MSFT	D	2.2%	6.98%	2.2%
V	A	1.11%	1.31%	1.11%
WFC	A	4.18%	1.82%	1.82%

BLCV Overweight 44 Positions Relative to FFLC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
C	A	3.58%
CAH	B	3.19%
SSNC	B	2.94%
LHX	C	2.73%
FCNCA	A	2.62%
MDT	D	2.5%
LDOS	C	2.4%
CTSH	B	2.3%
CVS	D	2.24%
ICE	C	2.23%
FIS	C	2.19%
EA	A	2.08%
LH	B	2.07%
BAX	F	1.99%
DNB	B	1.98%
EPD	A	1.96%
JCI	B	1.95%
GM	C	1.94%
RTX	D	1.85%
WAB	B	1.79%
SRE	A	1.76%
HES	B	1.62%
KHC	F	1.59%
HPQ	B	1.58%
EXC	C	1.58%
D	C	1.44%
AIG	B	1.41%
PPG	F	1.37%
VZ	C	1.36%
KOS	D	1.33%
APD	A	1.32%
WDC	D	1.32%
STZ	D	1.21%
APTV	F	1.2%
FNF	B	1.18%
WTW	B	1.14%
TPR	B	1.05%
IFF	D	1.02%
BTI	B	0.93%
DLTR	F	0.9%
SEE	C	0.81%
DG	F	0.59%
VOYA	B	0.49%
FTRE	D	0.42%

BLCV Underweight 75 Positions Relative to FFLC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	B	-5.71%
META	D	-4.7%
AAPL	C	-4.26%
GOOGL	C	-3.2%
XOM	B	-2.88%
BAC	A	-2.18%
AVGO	D	-1.98%
SO	C	-1.72%
UNH	B	-1.72%
GE	D	-1.61%
BSX	A	-1.35%
FI	A	-1.34%
EIX	B	-1.31%
TMO	F	-1.18%
SAP	B	-1.15%
LOW	C	-1.06%
CEG	C	-1.06%
KVUE	A	-1.04%
ETN	A	-1.02%
PNC	B	-1.01%
INTU	B	-1.0%
ORCL	A	-0.97%
TSM	B	-0.97%
KO	D	-0.94%
USB	A	-0.94%
URI	C	-0.92%
BMY	B	-0.92%
GEV	B	-0.87%
TRV	B	-0.87%
MA	B	-0.85%
APH	A	-0.85%
MOD	A	-0.84%
ALSN	B	-0.83%
UPS	C	-0.78%
RPRX	D	-0.76%
REGN	F	-0.75%
CB	C	-0.73%
VRT	B	-0.66%
HRB	D	-0.64%
COST	A	-0.63%
ABBV	F	-0.61%
UBER	F	-0.61%
APO	B	-0.61%
KNX	C	-0.59%
FDX	B	-0.58%
WSO	A	-0.56%
NVO	F	-0.53%
DOX	D	-0.53%
HLT	A	-0.52%
MLM	C	-0.49%
AMT	C	-0.43%
DEO	F	-0.43%
MAR	A	-0.42%
AJG	A	-0.41%
WSM	C	-0.4%
GD	D	-0.38%
GEN	B	-0.37%
COR	B	-0.37%
LEN	D	-0.36%
ABNB	C	-0.33%
GSK	F	-0.3%
HII	F	-0.29%
GILD	C	-0.27%
NOC	D	-0.25%
TMUS	B	-0.2%
LIN	C	-0.2%
MELI	C	-0.2%
DKS	D	-0.19%
SPR	D	-0.19%
ASML	F	-0.18%
SPG	A	-0.18%
IP	A	-0.18%
KBR	F	-0.17%
LNG	A	-0.03%
MRVL	B	-0.02%