AMID vs. CPAI ETF Comparison

Comparison of Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) to Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)
AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.72

Average Daily Volume

7,812

Number of Holdings *

37

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.81

Average Daily Volume

7,195

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period AMID CPAI
30 Days 4.32% 5.48%
60 Days 3.96% 9.78%
90 Days 4.88% 11.01%
12 Months 34.06%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in AMID Weight in CPAI Overlap
GDDY A 2.24% 2.23% 2.23%
HCA F 2.49% 1.61% 1.61%
AMID Overweight 35 Positions Relative to CPAI
Symbol Grade Weight
FICO B 3.79%
CTAS B 3.66%
CPRT B 3.56%
BLDR D 3.43%
FTNT C 3.34%
HLI A 3.2%
CBZ B 2.93%
LPLA A 2.87%
CDW F 2.86%
VCTR B 2.86%
DHI F 2.85%
IT C 2.83%
MEDP D 2.69%
MUSA B 2.63%
BAH F 2.45%
BLD D 2.43%
OMF A 2.4%
URI C 2.35%
AFG A 2.28%
A D 2.12%
ADUS D 2.09%
CG B 2.05%
SCI B 2.05%
TPX B 1.99%
AME A 1.98%
ICFI F 1.93%
LNG A 1.69%
CHDN B 1.57%
ABG C 1.55%
ENTG D 1.52%
MOH F 1.44%
PATK C 1.35%
TTEK F 1.33%
AX B 1.11%
EXPO D 0.99%
AMID Underweight 47 Positions Relative to CPAI
Symbol Grade Weight
SFM A -2.51%
SKYW C -2.49%
TRGP A -2.46%
TDS B -2.43%
CARG B -2.37%
LDOS C -2.33%
NTGR B -2.27%
UNM A -2.25%
OKE A -2.21%
FTDR B -2.17%
BRBR A -2.17%
EQH C -2.16%
CNO B -2.15%
HTZ C -2.13%
FTI A -2.13%
ACIW B -2.11%
VIRT A -2.11%
ORCL A -2.09%
CVLT B -2.08%
CAH B -2.08%
MSI B -2.07%
CLBT B -2.06%
COR B -2.05%
GOOGL C -2.05%
GNW A -2.03%
PBI B -2.01%
PGR A -1.93%
META D -1.93%
RTX D -1.9%
BRC D -1.89%
TJX A -1.89%
THC D -1.88%
LESL D -1.87%
NYT D -1.85%
ZIM C -1.84%
MSFT D -1.83%
WBA F -1.82%
AAPL C -1.81%
PAA B -1.8%
PAGP A -1.79%
WES C -1.76%
LLY F -1.74%
MHO D -1.72%
PRM C -1.72%
ROST D -1.72%
UHS D -1.64%
AGL F -0.95%
Compare ETFs