ACSI vs. FFLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF (ACSI) to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG)

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF

ACSI Description

American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF (the %u201CFund%u201D) seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index (the %u201CIndex%u201D).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.71

Average Daily Volume

205

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FFLG

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF

FFLG Description

FFLG seeks to achieve long-term capital growth by investing in large-cap companies believed to have above-average growth potential. The adviser generally defines large-caps as companies with similar market capitalizations to Russell 1000 or S&P 500 companies. Growth is measured based on factors such as earnings or revenue. Stocks are selected using fundamental analysis of factors such as financial condition and industry position of each issuer, as well as market and economic conditions. The adviser then incorporates a quantitative portfolio construction process to emphasize securities in which the adviser has high conviction, subject to risk, liquidity, and trading characteristics. The fund invests in both US and non-US companies. Despite its large-cap focus, the fund's strategy can lead to investments in small- and mid-cap companies. Before February 26, 2024, the fund traded as Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF under the ticker FGRO. The fund previously used a semitransparent ETF structure

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.98

Average Daily Volume

57,225

Number of Holdings ^*

100

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ACSI	FFLG
30 Days	2.80%	3.78%
60 Days	-0.72%	-9.68%
90 Days	3.06%	-4.37%
12 Months	23.22%	28.04%

10 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in ACSI	Weight in FFLG	Overlap
AAPL	C	6.93%	2.2%	2.2%
AMZN	D	4.26%	5.21%	4.26%
GOOG	D	4.67%	4.66%	4.66%
HUM	D	3.03%	0.89%	0.89%
META	C	2.42%	5.36%	2.42%
MSFT	D	4.3%	10.56%	4.3%
NFLX	B	2.79%	0.55%	0.55%
TMUS	B	3.14%	2.86%	2.86%
TSLA	D	1.99%	0.01%	0.01%
UNH	A	3.72%	2.14%	2.14%

ACSI Overweight 23 Positions Relative to FFLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
COST	B	7.13%
JPM	B	4.73%
KDP	A	4.31%
AIG	D	3.43%
T	A	3.11%
MSI	B	2.89%
VZ	B	2.85%
ORLY	B	2.53%
AEO	D	2.4%
YUM	B	2.38%
TSCO	B	2.37%
CLX	A	2.33%
SKX	B	2.32%
LEVI	C	2.28%
HLT	C	2.28%
FDX	D	2.25%
TXRH	D	2.24%
MS	C	2.22%
ALK	D	2.13%
SCHW	D	1.92%
BRK.A	B	1.46%
DUK	A	1.46%
ATO	A	1.44%

ACSI Underweight 90 Positions Relative to FFLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	D	-7.82%
UBER	B	-3.45%
GOOGL	D	-2.8%
ROKU	C	-2.65%
AMD	F	-1.93%
ON	D	-1.9%
BSX	A	-1.88%
SQ	D	-1.85%
FLEX	C	-1.84%
NXPI	D	-1.81%
SE	B	-1.73%
V	A	-1.57%
GPN	C	-1.32%
LLY	B	-1.25%
VRT	F	-1.2%
LPLA	D	-1.04%
ADBE	B	-1.01%
FND	C	-0.97%
MDB	C	-0.92%
ORCL	A	-0.91%
MQ	F	-0.87%
SNAP	F	-0.87%
EPAM	C	-0.86%
NOW	B	-0.84%
MRVL	D	-0.8%
CRM	D	-0.77%
BA	F	-0.74%
ZI	F	-0.68%
DT	A	-0.67%
CVNA	C	-0.66%
PCG	A	-0.64%
DDOG	D	-0.64%
TSM	D	-0.64%
MA	B	-0.59%
INTU	D	-0.58%
HUBS	F	-0.55%
CYTK	F	-0.55%
PEN	C	-0.54%
DLO	D	-0.51%
CNC	D	-0.5%
CEG	D	-0.49%
JBL	F	-0.47%
AGL	F	-0.46%
TMDX	C	-0.46%
TMO	A	-0.42%
BJ	D	-0.4%
PCVX	A	-0.4%
LOW	B	-0.4%
DHR	B	-0.38%
AMT	A	-0.38%
INTA	B	-0.36%
AR	F	-0.34%
LYFT	F	-0.29%
MGNI	D	-0.29%
GFS	F	-0.28%
AMAT	F	-0.26%
LITE	C	-0.26%
ACVA	B	-0.25%
DV	F	-0.23%
ARGX	A	-0.22%
OVV	F	-0.22%
CLDX	A	-0.22%
PANW	B	-0.19%
LULU	F	-0.17%
ETN	D	-0.17%
COHR	C	-0.16%
PSTG	F	-0.15%
BE	F	-0.14%
KO	B	-0.14%
APO	D	-0.12%
NUVL	A	-0.11%
MRNA	F	-0.1%
ACN	A	-0.1%
NVO	C	-0.1%
REGN	B	-0.1%
ALNY	C	-0.1%
CHTR	C	-0.09%
ZNTL	F	-0.08%
KROS	B	-0.07%
ALXO	F	-0.06%
SNOW	F	-0.06%
W	F	-0.05%
ANET	D	-0.05%
FSLR	C	-0.05%
AVGO	D	-0.04%
VLTO	B	-0.04%
ARM	D	-0.03%
LEN	B	-0.02%
ASND	D	-0.0%
ALHC	A	-0.0%