Risk Analysis Stocks List
Symbol | Grade | Name | % Change | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MCO | B | Moody's Corporation | 0.62 | |
VRSK | A | Verisk Analytics, Inc. | 0.87 |
Related Industries: Business Services Capital Markets
Symbol | Grade | Name | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TOLL | D | Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF | 5.89 | |
DFND | B | Realty Shares DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 4.29 | |
CWS | B | AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 4.15 | |
SEIQ | A | SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Quality Factor ETF | 4.13 | |
LEAD | C | Realty Shares DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | 3.79 |
Compare ETFs
- Risk Analysis
Risk management is the identification, evaluation, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO 31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities.
Risks can come from various sources including uncertainty in international markets, threats from project failures (at any phase in design, development, production, or sustaining of life-cycles), legal liabilities, credit risk, accidents, natural causes and disasters, deliberate attack from an adversary, or events of uncertain or unpredictable root-cause. There are two types of events i.e. negative events can be classified as risks while positive events are classified as opportunities. Risk management standards have been developed by various institutions, including the Project Management Institute, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, actuarial societies, and ISO standards. Methods, definitions and goals vary widely according to whether the risk management method is in the context of project management, security, engineering, industrial processes, financial portfolios, actuarial assessments, or public health and safety.
Strategies to manage threats (uncertainties with negative consequences) typically include avoiding the threat, reducing the negative effect or probability of the threat, transferring all or part of the threat to another party, and even retaining some or all of the potential or actual consequences of a particular threat. The opposite of these strategies can be used to respond to opportunities (uncertain future states with benefits).
Certain risk management standards have been criticized for having no measurable improvement on risk, whereas the confidence in estimates and decisions seems to increase. For example, one study found that one in six IT projects were "black swans" with gigantic overruns (cost overruns averaged 200%, and schedule overruns 70%).
Popular Now
Recent Comments
- TraderMike on BOOT
- Dr_Duru on BOOT
- TraderMike on Stochastic Reached Oversold
- SuccessfulGrasshopper897 on Stochastic Reached Oversold
- Cos3 on Adding float as advanced filter criteria?
From the Blog
Featured Articles