ZIG vs. XMHQ ETF Comparison
Comparison of The Acquirers Fund (ZIG) to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$39.71
Average Daily Volume
3,710
30
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
XMHQ Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400® Index.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$102.46
Average Daily Volume
295,815
77
Performance
Period | ZIG | XMHQ |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 5.79% | 5.76% |
60 Days | 8.82% | 8.32% |
90 Days | 10.71% | 7.20% |
12 Months | 31.49% | 30.94% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in ZIG | Weight in XMHQ | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX | C | 3.42% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
ZIG Overweight 29 Positions Relative to XMHQ
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
HCC | C | 3.56% | |
BTU | B | 3.5% | |
AMR | F | 3.47% | |
STLD | C | 3.45% | |
DPZ | D | 3.43% | |
YUM | C | 3.42% | |
NUE | D | 3.39% | |
MO | D | 3.37% | |
APAM | B | 3.36% | |
CF | A | 3.36% | |
STNG | B | 3.36% | |
DDS | D | 3.35% | |
VRSN | C | 3.34% | |
UI | B | 3.34% | |
CNS | C | 3.33% | |
VGR | B | 3.32% | |
TPL | A | 3.3% | |
SLM | B | 3.3% | |
LPX | C | 3.3% | |
TRMD | D | 3.25% | |
BCC | C | 3.24% | |
CALM | A | 3.24% | |
BPOP | D | 3.23% | |
CRC | B | 3.21% | |
BLDR | C | 3.2% | |
MLI | B | 3.19% | |
PBF | F | 3.18% | |
ATKR | F | 3.18% | |
SYF | A | 3.15% |
ZIG Underweight 76 Positions Relative to XMHQ
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
MANH | A | -4.16% | |
WSM | C | -3.98% | |
CSL | A | -3.82% | |
EME | B | -3.3% | |
THC | D | -2.43% | |
RNR | A | -2.4% | |
FIX | A | -2.24% | |
RS | D | -2.23% | |
TOL | C | -2.0% | |
GGG | C | -2.0% | |
LECO | D | -1.95% | |
OC | C | -1.93% | |
PSTG | F | -1.89% | |
BLD | D | -1.76% | |
KNSL | B | -1.72% | |
DKS | D | -1.72% | |
CW | A | -1.66% | |
DT | B | -1.63% | |
WMS | D | -1.62% | |
MEDP | F | -1.58% | |
CHE | D | -1.39% | |
EXP | C | -1.36% | |
RGLD | C | -1.36% | |
MUSA | D | -1.35% | |
CELH | F | -1.32% | |
CR | A | -1.32% | |
CNM | F | -1.3% | |
AFG | A | -1.25% | |
TREX | D | -1.24% | |
CVLT | B | -1.24% | |
PRI | A | -1.22% | |
INGR | B | -1.22% | |
LNTH | C | -1.22% | |
CHK | C | -1.2% | |
UFPI | C | -1.19% | |
LSCC | D | -1.18% | |
AYI | A | -1.18% | |
AIT | B | -1.15% | |
LSTR | F | -1.12% | |
SAIC | A | -1.12% | |
SEIC | B | -1.08% | |
DCI | B | -1.08% | |
SSD | B | -1.05% | |
WFRD | F | -0.97% | |
RLI | A | -0.97% | |
PCTY | C | -0.97% | |
COKE | C | -0.95% | |
DINO | F | -0.93% | |
KBH | D | -0.91% | |
MSA | F | -0.87% | |
ELF | F | -0.85% | |
EXPO | A | -0.85% | |
CHX | C | -0.85% | |
MTG | A | -0.84% | |
CBT | B | -0.84% | |
ESNT | A | -0.84% | |
MDU | C | -0.82% | |
G | A | -0.82% | |
VVV | D | -0.8% | |
QLYS | F | -0.8% | |
CRUS | D | -0.8% | |
VNT | F | -0.78% | |
MSM | D | -0.67% | |
NEU | F | -0.62% | |
LOPE | D | -0.56% | |
NSP | F | -0.54% | |
ENS | B | -0.52% | |
LANC | F | -0.51% | |
YETI | C | -0.5% | |
TEX | F | -0.47% | |
FHI | A | -0.45% | |
VC | F | -0.41% | |
IBOC | D | -0.41% | |
SAM | D | -0.41% | |
CRI | D | -0.4% | |
CXT | F | -0.36% |
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
XMHQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords