XMHQ vs. PYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials (PYZ)

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$95.72

Average Daily Volume

445,027

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PYZ

PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials

PYZ Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Basic Materials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of stocks of 60 US basic materials companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$87.19

Average Daily Volume

1,911

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMHQ	PYZ
30 Days	-7.80%	-2.94%
60 Days	-10.06%	-2.78%
90 Days	-12.04%	-5.49%
12 Months	22.05%	5.41%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMHQ	Weight in PYZ	Overlap
CBT	D	0.7%	2.03%	0.7%
NEU	D	0.59%	1.31%	0.59%
RS	D	2.24%	3.86%	2.24%
VVV	B	0.83%	1.96%	0.83%

XMHQ Overweight 75 Positions Relative to PYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WSM	D	3.82%
MANH	B	3.72%
CSL	C	3.63%
EME	D	2.95%
CELH	F	2.5%
PSTG	B	2.46%
THC	C	2.07%
MEDP	C	2.02%
RNR	D	1.96%
LECO	F	1.93%
OC	D	1.93%
GGG	D	1.88%
FIX	D	1.82%
ERIE	C	1.79%
BLD	D	1.72%
WMS	D	1.66%
DKS	C	1.64%
ELF	C	1.59%
CROX	C	1.57%
TOL	D	1.53%
KNSL	F	1.51%
WFRD	B	1.49%
CNM	D	1.45%
DT	F	1.44%
CW	C	1.43%
LSCC	D	1.39%
TREX	F	1.35%
CHE	D	1.29%
CHK	D	1.29%
MUSA	C	1.26%
CR	C	1.25%
RGLD	B	1.25%
AFG	D	1.15%
LSTR	D	1.15%
DINO	D	1.13%
PRI	C	1.11%
AYI	D	1.1%
DCI	D	1.08%
EXP	D	1.07%
SEIC	D	1.07%
UFPI	D	1.04%
CVLT	B	1.04%
INGR	D	1.03%
AIT	C	1.02%
SAIC	D	0.98%
CHX	C	0.98%
LNTH	C	0.95%
SSD	F	0.94%
QLYS	D	0.93%
VNT	D	0.92%
MSA	C	0.92%
RLI	D	0.89%
CRUS	A	0.87%
COKE	B	0.83%
PCTY	F	0.81%
ESNT	C	0.77%
MDU	C	0.77%
KBH	D	0.74%
EXPO	C	0.73%
MTG	B	0.73%
G	D	0.69%
MSM	F	0.63%
NSP	F	0.58%
LOPE	C	0.57%
LANC	B	0.56%
ENS	C	0.54%
TEX	D	0.51%
VC	D	0.47%
YETI	F	0.47%
SAM	C	0.46%
IBOC	C	0.41%
FHI	C	0.41%
CRI	F	0.39%
CACC	B	0.39%
HELE	F	0.31%

XMHQ Underweight 46 Positions Relative to PYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AVY	D	-4.44%
STLD	D	-4.15%
APD	D	-3.71%
LIN	C	-3.7%
LYB	D	-3.61%
NUE	F	-3.32%
ATI	C	-3.12%
CRS	B	-2.9%
LPX	D	-2.58%
SLVM	D	-2.57%
WLK	D	-2.37%
RPM	D	-2.36%
FCX	C	-2.23%
IFF	B	-2.17%
ECL	B	-2.15%
CTVA	D	-2.13%
IP	C	-2.09%
DOW	D	-1.9%
CE	F	-1.84%
SUM	D	-1.84%
SMG	D	-1.77%
WOR	F	-1.71%
FMC	F	-1.69%
ESI	B	-1.69%
OLN	F	-1.69%
CMC	D	-1.66%
HWKN	B	-1.65%
CF	F	-1.6%
UEC	D	-1.53%
KWR	F	-1.48%
CLF	D	-1.47%
CENX	B	-1.46%
FUL	D	-1.31%
HUN	F	-1.27%
MATV	D	-1.21%
IOSP	D	-1.21%
PCT	C	-1.2%
AVNT	D	-1.2%
SXC	D	-1.16%
CC	F	-1.12%
MTX	C	-1.12%
KALU	D	-1.06%
MTRN	F	-1.05%
OI	F	-0.95%
BCPC	A	-0.94%
SCL	D	-0.92%