XMHQ vs. ITB ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB)

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$99.14

Average Daily Volume

269,982

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ITB

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

ITB Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the home construction sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the home construction sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$117.15

Average Daily Volume

1,628,664

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMHQ	ITB
30 Days	-2.78%	-7.30%
60 Days	-1.84%	-3.07%
90 Days	2.28%	1.19%
12 Months	26.34%	49.47%

8 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMHQ	Weight in ITB	Overlap
BLD	F	1.66%	3.06%	1.66%
EXP	B	1.41%	1.36%	1.36%
KBH	D	0.87%	1.56%	0.87%
OC	B	2.07%	2.22%	2.07%
SSD	F	1.03%	1.07%	1.03%
TOL	C	2.03%	4.25%	2.03%
TREX	B	1.21%	0.97%	0.97%
UFPI	C	1.22%	1.11%	1.11%

XMHQ Overweight 68 Positions Relative to ITB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MANH	D	4.08%
CSL	C	4.02%
WSM	F	3.69%
EME	A	3.49%
RNR	C	2.48%
FIX	B	2.38%
RS	C	2.3%
THC	C	2.27%
PSTG	D	2.04%
LECO	B	1.99%
GGG	D	1.93%
CW	B	1.78%
KNSL	F	1.78%
DT	B	1.7%
DKS	F	1.65%
MEDP	F	1.62%
WMS	F	1.59%
RGLD	B	1.43%
CHE	F	1.41%
CROX	F	1.36%
CELH	F	1.36%
AYI	A	1.33%
CNM	D	1.33%
LNTH	C	1.31%
PRI	B	1.3%
MUSA	C	1.3%
CR	B	1.28%
AFG	D	1.24%
INGR	C	1.22%
AIT	A	1.22%
SAIC	A	1.21%
LSCC	C	1.19%
SEIC	A	1.19%
DCI	B	1.11%
LSTR	D	1.1%
CVLT	B	1.1%
PCTY	A	1.05%
RLI	B	1.02%
COKE	D	0.96%
ROIV	D	0.94%
WFRD	F	0.91%
DINO	F	0.9%
MTG	D	0.86%
CHX	F	0.85%
CBT	B	0.85%
MSA	F	0.83%
ELF	F	0.83%
ESNT	F	0.83%
EXPO	D	0.82%
VNT	B	0.82%
G	C	0.82%
CRUS	F	0.81%
VVV	D	0.8%
QLYS	F	0.77%
MSM	D	0.62%
NEU	D	0.61%
NSP	F	0.54%
LOPE	D	0.53%
LANC	B	0.51%
ENS	F	0.51%
TEX	F	0.49%
FHI	A	0.48%
SAM	C	0.46%
YETI	F	0.46%
IBOC	B	0.43%
CRI	F	0.41%
VC	F	0.4%
CXT	F	0.36%

XMHQ Underweight 36 Positions Relative to ITB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DHI	D	-14.72%
LEN	D	-11.67%
NVR	D	-7.99%
PHM	D	-7.74%
LOW	B	-4.77%
HD	B	-4.73%
SHW	D	-4.23%
BLDR	F	-2.95%
LII	B	-2.77%
MAS	D	-2.52%
TMHC	A	-1.96%
MTH	D	-1.85%
FND	D	-1.55%
FBIN	C	-1.52%
IBP	F	-1.48%
SKY	C	-1.3%
MHO	D	-1.21%
MHK	D	-1.11%
TPH	D	-1.05%
CVCO	A	-0.94%
AZEK	C	-0.86%
BECN	B	-0.81%
CCS	F	-0.71%
GRBK	D	-0.64%
LGIH	F	-0.59%
LEN	D	-0.5%
MBC	B	-0.32%
HAYW	A	-0.3%
DFH	F	-0.25%
BZH	D	-0.24%
LEG	F	-0.23%
NX	C	-0.2%
AMWD	D	-0.2%
JELD	F	-0.17%
ETD	F	-0.09%
ARHS	F	-0.07%