XLV vs. NBCT ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR Select Sector Fund - Health Care (XLV) to Neuberger Berman Carbon Transition Infrastructure ETF (NBCT)

XLV

SPDR Select Sector Fund - Health Care

XLV Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in The Health Care Select Sector Index. In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies from the following industries: pharmaceuticals; health care equipment & supplies; health care providers & services; biotechnology; life sciences tools & services; and health care technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$144.41

Average Daily Volume

6,464,678

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NBCT

Neuberger Berman Carbon Transition Infrastructure ETF

NBCT Description

Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowing for investment purposes) in equity securities of carbon transition companies and infrastructure companies. It invests a significant portion of its assets in carbon transition companies, which the Managers consider to be those companies that have, or in the Portfolio Managers" view, are reasonably expected to have, at least 20% of their assets or revenue, committed to or derived from infrastructure that will facilitate global decarbonization and/or the reduction of other greenhouse gas emissions.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.67

Average Daily Volume

841

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XLV	NBCT
30 Days	-0.56%	-3.31%
60 Days	2.53%	0.81%
90 Days	1.23%	3.78%
12 Months	12.43%	14.26%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XLV	Weight in NBCT	Overlap
	ABBV	C	5.55%	5.37%	5.37%

XLV Overweight 58 Positions Relative to NBCT

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LLY	A	13.49%
UNH	D	8.32%
JNJ	F	6.52%
MRK	C	6.11%
TMO	D	3.91%
ABT	D	3.38%
AMGN	B	3.13%
DHR	D	3.08%
PFE	C	2.93%
ISRG	A	2.93%
ELV	C	2.31%
VRTX	B	2.27%
SYK	B	2.15%
BSX	B	2.1%
REGN	B	2.07%
MDT	D	1.96%
CI	D	1.76%
GILD	C	1.59%
BMY	F	1.56%
ZTS	C	1.5%
MCK	B	1.43%
CVS	D	1.36%
HCA	C	1.24%
BDX	F	1.24%
EW	B	1.05%
DXCM	D	0.85%
HUM	C	0.81%
IDXX	D	0.76%
MRNA	D	0.75%
IQV	D	0.72%
A	D	0.71%
CNC	D	0.67%
BIIB	C	0.62%
GEHC	D	0.62%
MTD	D	0.56%
RMD	C	0.52%
WST	F	0.45%
CAH	D	0.45%
ZBH	D	0.41%
STE	C	0.4%
MOH	F	0.33%
ALGN	D	0.32%
BAX	C	0.32%
HOLX	C	0.32%
WAT	D	0.31%
DGX	C	0.28%
PODD	C	0.27%
VTRS	D	0.23%
TECH	D	0.21%
INCY	D	0.21%
UHS	C	0.21%
CRL	F	0.2%
CTLT	B	0.19%
TFX	C	0.18%
HSIC	D	0.15%
DVA	C	0.14%
SOLV	F	0.13%
BIO	D	0.1%

XLV Underweight 29 Positions Relative to NBCT

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LIN	C	-5.46%
CEG	B	-5.12%
ETN	C	-5.0%
FSLR	C	-4.21%
NEE	D	-3.95%
PWR	D	-3.81%
LNG	B	-3.69%
HUBB	C	-3.52%
ITRI	C	-3.37%
WMB	B	-3.18%
WCN	B	-2.79%
GEV	B	-2.54%
D	C	-2.02%
CNP	B	-1.81%
J	D	-1.81%
DTM	B	-1.71%
ORA	C	-1.68%
SRE	B	-1.64%
GNRC	C	-1.54%
FE	C	-1.34%
SHW	D	-1.22%
AY	B	-1.14%
DUK	C	-1.13%
GTLS	D	-1.11%
NEP	F	-1.09%
RSG	A	-1.03%
APD	D	-0.96%
EXC	D	-0.96%
JCI	D	-0.84%