UPW vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)

UPW

ProShares Ultra Utilities

UPW Description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. UtilitiesSM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the utilities sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, electric utilities, gas utilities, multi-utilities and water utilities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$81.02

Average Daily Volume

6,717

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$106.44

Average Daily Volume

4,381

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	UPW	CZA
30 Days	12.55%	3.40%
60 Days	26.68%	5.05%
90 Days	32.58%	8.26%
12 Months	51.08%	24.74%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in UPW	Weight in CZA	Overlap
AEE	A	1.16%	1.53%	1.16%
DTE	B	1.34%	1.79%	1.34%
ES	C	1.24%	1.63%	1.24%
ETR	A	1.38%	1.83%	1.38%
NI	B	0.79%	1.02%	0.79%

UPW Overweight 26 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NEE	C	8.94%
SO	A	5.04%
DUK	B	4.67%
CEG	A	3.12%
AEP	C	2.83%
SRE	B	2.69%
D	B	2.5%
PCG	B	2.19%
PEG	A	2.16%
EXC	B	2.08%
ED	C	1.86%
XEL	B	1.85%
EIX	C	1.7%
WEC	B	1.56%
AWK	C	1.49%
VST	A	1.37%
PPL	B	1.23%
FE	C	1.19%
CMS	B	1.08%
ATO	B	1.06%
CNP	D	0.92%
NRG	A	0.87%
LNT	B	0.79%
EVRG	B	0.72%
AES	C	0.67%
PNW	B	0.53%

UPW Underweight 89 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIG	B	-2.31%
AVB	C	-2.27%
PPG	D	-2.08%
LYB	F	-2.06%
WAB	A	-2.04%
BRO	C	-2.04%
WTW	C	-2.02%
EQR	C	-2.01%
VLTO	B	-1.85%
FTV	C	-1.78%
STT	B	-1.7%
CHKP	A	-1.53%
WRB	C	-1.52%
CPAY	C	-1.45%
CINF	C	-1.44%
LDOS	B	-1.42%
BAX	C	-1.39%
TDY	C	-1.39%
BAH	B	-1.36%
CSL	B	-1.34%
PFG	B	-1.29%
PKG	B	-1.26%
J	C	-1.24%
SUI	C	-1.24%
NTRS	B	-1.24%
WLK	D	-1.23%
AER	B	-1.22%
AVY	D	-1.21%
FOX	B	-1.17%
EG	C	-1.12%
RPM	B	-1.1%
LPLA	F	-1.06%
UDR	C	-1.05%
IEX	D	-1.04%
SN	B	-1.01%
WMG	D	-1.0%
GGG	C	-0.96%
GLPI	C	-0.96%
TRMB	C	-0.95%
REG	C	-0.95%
CNA	D	-0.92%
BAP	B	-0.92%
RNR	B	-0.91%
LOGI	D	-0.91%
ACM	B	-0.91%
EMN	B	-0.83%
EPAM	F	-0.81%
FLEX	C	-0.81%
ITT	B	-0.77%
NVT	D	-0.75%
PFGC	B	-0.75%
QGEN	C	-0.73%
RRX	C	-0.72%
CACI	B	-0.72%
ATR	B	-0.7%
SKX	D	-0.7%
WWD	C	-0.7%
AIZ	B	-0.69%
HII	D	-0.69%
EGP	C	-0.62%
CR	C	-0.6%
SEIC	C	-0.6%
INGR	B	-0.6%
BWXT	C	-0.6%
COLD	D	-0.56%
WEX	C	-0.56%
MOS	F	-0.55%
AWI	B	-0.55%
VOYA	B	-0.51%
ALSN	B	-0.51%
G	C	-0.49%
IVZ	B	-0.49%
BPOP	C	-0.47%
ESNT	B	-0.46%
OSK	D	-0.45%
LFUS	C	-0.43%
ESAB	C	-0.42%
PFSI	C	-0.4%
RRR	F	-0.39%
MDU	B	-0.38%
ACT	B	-0.38%
SLGN	B	-0.37%
BLCO	C	-0.37%
VNT	F	-0.36%
FNB	D	-0.34%
FLO	C	-0.33%
FELE	C	-0.31%
SEM	D	-0.31%
ZGN	F	-0.28%