UMI vs. SEA ETF Comparison
Comparison of USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI) to U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA)
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
UMI Description
The investment seeks a high level of current income; as a secondary objective, the fund seeks capital appreciation. The fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian companies of any market capitalization deemed by the Sub-Adviser to be engaged in the midstream energy sector. It will invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the energy, oil, and gas industries. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$45.34
Average Daily Volume
17,725
15
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
SEA Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the Dow Jones Global Shipping IndexSM (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index, as well as American depositary receipts (ADRs) and global depositary receipts (GDRs) that represent securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is comprised of developed market-listed equity securities of companies that are classified as being in the shipping industry. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$18.10
Average Daily Volume
4,474
13
Performance
| Period | UMI | SEA |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.58% | 4.16% |
| 60 Days | 7.55% | 9.43% |
| 90 Days | 6.70% | -1.42% |
| 12 Months | 36.73% | 22.00% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in UMI | Weight in SEA | Overlap |
|---|
UMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
SEA: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
