UMI vs. RSPG ETF Comparison
Comparison of USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI) to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
UMI Description
The investment seeks a high level of current income; as a secondary objective, the fund seeks capital appreciation. The fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian companies of any market capitalization deemed by the Sub-Adviser to be engaged in the midstream energy sector. It will invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the energy, oil, and gas industries. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$53.68
Average Daily Volume
18,269
16
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
RSPG Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Energy Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the energy sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$86.09
Average Daily Volume
40,852
22
Performance
| Period | UMI | RSPG |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 14.48% | 10.12% |
| 60 Days | 17.87% | 9.98% |
| 90 Days | 21.04% | 8.85% |
| 12 Months | 52.82% | 18.31% |
UMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RSPG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
