TDV vs. NBSM ETF Comparison
Comparison of ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) to Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM)
TDV
ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
TDV Description
The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$75.28
Average Daily Volume
16,147
35
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
NBSM Description
NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$24.87
Average Daily Volume
14,348
10
Performance
| Period | TDV | NBSM |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 4.11% | -0.72% |
| 60 Days | 8.34% | -1.47% |
| 90 Days | 7.65% | -2.89% |
| 12 Months | 15.19% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in TDV | Weight in NBSM | Overlap |
|---|
TDV Overweight 35 Positions Relative to NBSM
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | B | 3.39% | |
| AAPL | A | 3.34% | |
| KLAC | B | 3.34% | |
| HPQ | C | 3.22% | |
| QCOM | B | 3.19% | |
| GLW | B | 3.18% | |
| ADI | B | 3.18% | |
| APH | B | 3.16% | |
| ORCL | A | 3.14% | |
| CGNX | B | 3.12% | |
| TXN | B | 3.12% | |
| LRCX | A | 3.12% | |
| MSI | B | 2.93% | |
| MSFT | A | 2.92% | |
| LFUS | C | 2.9% | |
| SWKS | C | 2.83% | |
| POWI | D | 2.83% | |
| MCHP | C | 2.82% | |
| AVT | D | 2.81% | |
| INTU | B | 2.78% | |
| TEL | B | 2.73% | |
| ROP | B | 2.71% | |
| BMI | C | 2.71% | |
| BR | B | 2.65% | |
| SSNC | B | 2.63% | |
| DLB | D | 2.61% | |
| JKHY | C | 2.59% | |
| V | D | 2.54% | |
| CSCO | D | 2.53% | |
| MA | D | 2.5% | |
| ACN | C | 2.47% | |
| CASS | D | 2.46% | |
| CDW | D | 2.45% | |
| IBM | B | 2.42% | |
| CSGS | F | 2.16% |
TDV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
NBSM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
