SPHD vs. QTUM ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares S&P 500 High Dividend Portfolio (SPHD) to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

SPHD

PowerShares S&P 500 High Dividend Portfolio

SPHD Description

The PowerShares S&P 500® High Dividend Portfolio (the “Fund”) seeks investment results that generally correspond (before fees and expenses) to the price and yield of the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index (the “Underlying Index”). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Underlying Index. Standard & Poor’s® compiles, maintains and calculates the Underlying Index, which is composed of 50 securities traded on the S&P 500 Index that historically have provided high dividend yields and low volatility. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted semi-annually, in January and July

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$51.14

Average Daily Volume

656,652

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QTUM

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUM Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index (the "index"). Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index or in depositary receipts representing such component securities. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of the stock of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of quantum computing and machine learning technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$68.45

Average Daily Volume

38,983

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SPHD	QTUM
30 Days	1.23%	8.84%
60 Days	2.34%	11.51%
90 Days	5.44%	10.08%
12 Months	33.65%	37.45%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in SPHD	Weight in QTUM	Overlap
	ABBV	D	1.37%	1.32%	1.32%
	IBM	C	1.77%	1.75%	1.75%

SPHD Overweight 48 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MO	A	3.1%
BMY	B	2.97%
KMI	A	2.93%
T	A	2.72%
VZ	C	2.68%
CCI	D	2.52%
OKE	A	2.52%
SPG	B	2.46%
VICI	C	2.42%
D	C	2.38%
PM	B	2.32%
WMB	A	2.28%
KVUE	A	2.26%
K	A	2.26%
GILD	C	2.24%
ETR	B	2.21%
EVRG	A	2.18%
O	D	2.14%
PFE	D	2.13%
AMCR	D	2.06%
PNW	B	2.02%
VTRS	A	2.01%
UPS	C	1.98%
KHC	F	1.94%
WEC	A	1.93%
ES	D	1.9%
LYB	F	1.88%
EIX	B	1.84%
CAG	D	1.84%
FRT	B	1.84%
HST	C	1.82%
EXC	C	1.8%
DOW	F	1.8%
PRU	A	1.78%
FE	C	1.75%
IPG	D	1.75%
DRI	B	1.69%
CSCO	B	1.68%
DUK	C	1.68%
CVX	A	1.65%
MDT	D	1.55%
GIS	D	1.49%
SJM	D	1.48%
OMC	C	1.43%
HRL	D	1.42%
XOM	B	1.39%
EMN	D	1.38%
JNJ	D	1.3%

SPHD Underweight 48 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSTR	C	-4.52%
QBTS	B	-2.48%
COHR	B	-2.03%
RGTI	C	-2.03%
RDNT	B	-1.84%
ACN	C	-1.73%
WIT	A	-1.7%
MRVL	B	-1.69%
LMT	D	-1.61%
NVDA	C	-1.61%
NOC	D	-1.59%
BABA	D	-1.54%
NOK	D	-1.54%
RTX	C	-1.54%
HON	B	-1.5%
TSM	B	-1.5%
HPE	B	-1.4%
JNPR	F	-1.39%
TXN	C	-1.38%
GOOGL	C	-1.37%
CDNS	B	-1.35%
BAH	F	-1.31%
MSFT	F	-1.3%
SNPS	B	-1.27%
BIDU	F	-1.27%
TDC	D	-1.23%
ON	D	-1.22%
ADI	D	-1.22%
AMD	F	-1.19%
NVEC	C	-1.18%
CRUS	D	-1.12%
LSCC	D	-1.11%
MKSI	C	-1.1%
NXPI	D	-1.08%
INTC	D	-1.08%
ESTC	C	-1.07%
SYNA	C	-1.05%
KLAC	D	-1.03%
ONTO	D	-1.0%
QCOM	F	-0.99%
AMAT	F	-0.99%
MU	D	-0.97%
FORM	D	-0.96%
TER	D	-0.96%
MCHP	D	-0.95%
LRCX	F	-0.93%
ASML	F	-0.85%
STM	F	-0.75%