SMIG vs. UPW ETF Comparison

Comparison of AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) to ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW)
SMIG

AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF

SMIG Description

ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by ETF Series Solutions. The fund is co-managed by Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Bahl & Gaynor, Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in dividend paying stocks of companies. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. ETF Series Solutions - AAM Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.85

Average Daily Volume

79,647

Number of Holdings *

42

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
UPW

ProShares Ultra Utilities

UPW Description The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. UtilitiesSM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the utilities sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, electric utilities, gas utilities, multi-utilities and water utilities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$77.60

Average Daily Volume

6,966

Number of Holdings *

31

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SMIG UPW
30 Days 2.12% 9.01%
60 Days 4.71% 23.60%
90 Days 9.56% 25.31%
12 Months 25.58% 42.01%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SMIG Weight in UPW Overlap
ATO B 2.04% 1.06% 1.06%
CMS A 1.35% 1.08% 1.08%
LNT A 2.03% 0.79% 0.79%
NI B 3.42% 0.79% 0.79%
SMIG Overweight 38 Positions Relative to UPW
Symbol Grade Weight
BAH B 5.02%
VCTR B 4.6%
BR D 4.36%
HIG A 4.21%
TRGP B 4.06%
HUBB B 3.96%
PKG B 3.9%
WSO C 3.63%
SNA B 3.54%
DOX C 3.37%
DGX B 3.27%
EVR B 3.22%
ADC C 2.95%
AVY D 2.9%
AFG B 2.54%
PRGO D 2.53%
IPAR D 2.51%
NTAP D 2.37%
TRNO C 2.1%
TXRH D 2.07%
HOMB B 2.03%
LANC D 1.95%
AVT D 1.94%
RPM B 1.91%
PAGP D 1.74%
CBOE C 1.7%
CAG B 1.55%
AVNT B 1.48%
NXST D 1.4%
ELS C 1.26%
PAG D 1.04%
MTH B 1.03%
FFBC C 0.9%
CSGS C 0.82%
SON C 0.79%
NSP D 0.79%
TSCO C 0.52%
USPH D 0.42%
SMIG Underweight 27 Positions Relative to UPW
Symbol Grade Weight
NEE B -8.94%
SO B -5.04%
DUK C -4.67%
CEG C -3.12%
AEP B -2.83%
SRE B -2.69%
D C -2.5%
PCG C -2.19%
PEG B -2.16%
EXC B -2.08%
ED C -1.86%
XEL A -1.85%
EIX C -1.7%
WEC B -1.56%
AWK A -1.49%
ETR A -1.38%
VST C -1.37%
DTE B -1.34%
ES C -1.24%
PPL C -1.23%
FE C -1.19%
AEE B -1.16%
CNP C -0.92%
NRG C -0.87%
EVRG A -0.72%
AES C -0.67%
PNW B -0.53%
Compare ETFs